Friday 18th of April 2014

pass the coolaid .....

pass the coolaid .....

The Tony Abbott gravy train hurtles along at a frenetic pace, picking up fellow travellers at every stop and showing every sign of careering out of control. Managing editor David Donovan comments.

The appointment of former MP Sophie Mirabella and conservative spin doctor Tim Wilson to well-paid cushy public positions yesterday raises further significant questions about the probity of the Abbott administration and its approach to public finances.

Questions that were already being asked about its ideological, nepotistic and vindictive approach to governing are now reaching a crescendo.

The Abbott Government in its first weeks in power was subject to enormous attention due to its flagrant and widespread abuse of travel entitlementsPeople contrasted the Coalition's bitter condemnation of Peter Slipper's apparently trivial $1,000 charge against the tens of thousands of dollars Prime Minister Abbott and his colleagues had claimed, for such important matters of state as going on fun runs, competing in triathlons, going on elongated cycling excursions and even attending friends' weddings. There appeared to be a "what we can get away with" attitude prevalent within the Coalition mindset, which was in no way dissipated by Abbott's utter refusal to launch any investigation into the entitlement scams or tighten the rules in any significant way.

Also in the first weeks in power, the Coalition began a process of purging political foes.

Hours after gaining power, Abbott sacked four public service chiefs who were presumably seen as being too close to the former Labor Government, including top Treasury official Martin Parkinson.

This followed on the example of Abbott’s mentor and hero, John Howard, who purged himself of six departmental heads immediately after becoming PM.

Former Treasury secretary and Westpac chair Ted Evans reportedly expressed his disgust at these latest political sackings, saying:

"It's hard enough to get top class people these days. To see them treated in a political fashion is more than disappointing, it's sad for the country frankly.

"We'll end up as bad as other countries ... where appointments are purely political, the U.S. for example."

Three days after the September 7 election, incoming Foreign Minister Julie Bishop sacked highly regarded former Victorian premier Steve Bracks as Australia's Consul-General in New York. Deputy Opposition Leader Tanya Plibersek reflected the prevailing view, describing the move as "petty and vindictive".

At around the same time, new communications minister Malcolm Turnbull announced that the entire NBN board had suddenly decided to resign en masse. Of course, it soon emerged that Australia’s second richest politician had, in fact, asked them all to go. In its place, Turnbull appointed a three man board, including as temporary CEO Howard crony, former Telstra CEO and, more recently, nuclear industry apologist Dr Ziggy Switkowski.

Then, in late October, it emerged that Labor appointee Mike Kaiser had been sacked as an NBN Co executive to make way for one of Malcolm Turnbull's close personal friends, J.B. Rousellot, who worked with Turnbull at Ozemail, as well as in Turnbull's advisory firm and with whom the Communications Minister owns a yacht. At the same time, Turnbull also appointed former Ozemail colleague Justin Milne to a key executive role.

Other notable jobs for the boys include the appointment of Labor turncoat and Abbott confidante Warren Mundine – someone generally poorly regarded in the Indigenous community – to head his Indigenous advisory committee, and yet another Howard crony, market fundamentalist climate denier and former ABC chair Maurice Newman, to become head of Abbott's business advisory committee.

But yesterday came perhaps the most alarming examples of cronyism so far, with Sophie Mirabella and Tim Wilson being appointed to highly paid Government positions on the same day the Treasurer Joe Hockey announced  the Australian Government was going to make deep cuts in welfare, education and health spending due an entirely confected “budget emergency”.

The irony was intense.

Sophie Mirabella was a Liberal MP so outstandingly unpopular, she was voted out of her safe rural conservative Victorian seat this year by a previously little-known Independent. Her main achievement in her legal career, prior to being elected to parliament in 2001, was in 1995 successfully pursuing a live-in relationship with the then Melbourne University dean of law, Colin Howard – a man 40 years her senior – before being granted power of attorney by him and making herself the sole beneficiary of his lucrative estate, which she duly inherited upon his death. This is, as you might imagine, the subject of a bitter and ongoing dispute with his adult children.

Mirabella is a close ally of Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who rewarded her yesterday as one of his three new appointments to the troubled Government-owned shipbuilding firm ASC Pty Ltd. The announcement was made at 5pm yesterday, just after Australia had won back the Ashes and when most news was focusing on Joe Hockey's nervous and misleading MYEFO announcement.

Opposition treasury spokesperson Chris Bowen asked the obvious question about this appointment, noting the previous governments more bipartisan approach

"What does she [Mirabella] understand about the Australian Submarine Corporation which other eminently qualified people from industry couldn't have contributed?," he told ABC television on Wednesday.

Mr Bowen said Labor had appointed people from "right across the board" to senior positions, including former Liberal leader Brendan Nelson to a diplomatic posting.

He suggested the timing of the announcement bespoke a guilty conscience:

The fact this announcement was made late in the afternoon on a busy news day, when Australia had won the Ashes and the government was involved in the mid-year economic review, spoke volumes, he said.

"Says to me, they're not particularly proud of the appointment either," Mr Bowen said.

It was the announcement by Attorney General George Brandis that Tim Wilson would become Australia's newest Human Rights Commissioner ‒ or, in his words, “freedom commissioner”  that left most people up in arms with jaws on ground.

Wilson was, until yesterday, an oleaginous spin doctor for extreme right-wing lobby group the Institute of Public Affairs - a paid campaigner for the interests of mining, big tobacco, fossil fuel interests and big business in general. The IPA has, as one of its core policy objectives, the abolition of the Australian Human Rights Commission.

Tim Wilson has been notably critical of the Australian Human Rights Commission in the past, especially in his support for the so-called "free speech" of conservative commentator and convicted racist Andrew Bolt. It was this, no doubt, that has led to his appointment to the AHRC by cultural warrior George Brandis.

Wilson himself is a notable "small government" advocate and, until yesterday, a Liberal Party member (he says he resigned from the IPA and Liberal Party upon getting the AHRC job). How he can justify a $325,000 per annum paid government sinecure at an organisation he called to be closed down is almost impossible to reconcile. More difficult still is the thought that the Coalition Government could consider him a suitable person to fill that role.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported Labor and The Greens slamming this blatantly ideological move:

The shadow attorney-general, Mark Dreyfus, described Mr Wilson's appointment as ''dubious to say the least''.

''How can Mr Wilson possibly undertake the role of a Human Rights Commissioner when it's obvious he has such contempt for the commission itself?'' Mr Dreyfus said.

''By appointing Mr Wilson, Senator Brandis has sent a strong signal about exactly the kind of blatant political agenda he wishes to pursue as Attorney-General."

Greens legal affairs spokeswoman Penny Wright described Mr Wilson's views as ''extreme'' and said Senator Brandis had ''laid his ideological cards on the table''.

''The Attorney-General has already made it clear he thinks some human rights are more important than others, including that free speech ought to trump anti-discrimination laws,'' she said.

There is no other conclusion than that, like snooty Young Liberals having taken over the university student union, they are giving their mates jobs while thumbing their noses at everyone else. In short, they are trolling us.

It is similarly hard to escape the conclusion that, for the conservatives, gaining power is not about furthering the good of the country — it is about furthering their own causes – ideological and financial – along with those of their fellow travellers.

With Joe Hockey's faux budget emergency sweatily delivered yesterday, expect the Government to soon begin slashing welfare and selling off whatever few remaining Government assets are left after the Howard years to major Coalition donors at firesale prices.

This process has, indeed, already begun in Queensland under the Newman Government.

All aboard! All aboard! The Abbott Gravy Train is leaving the station. Big business and Coalition cronies make your way up to first class. Everyone else, squeeze in where you can. Hold on tight, people on the roof, you could be in for a very rough ride.

The Tony Abbott gravy train collects more Coalition cronies



fries with that?

from john passant ….

The Abbott government has appointed Tim Wilson as a Human Rights Commissioner and this has excited much of the rights Left.

Of course his appointment is an outrage. An outrage I tell you. Imagine having someone without a human rights background, with political connections and a political and economic ideology appointed to the Human Rights Commission. Labor Party appointee Tim Soutphommasane anyone?

Ah but evidently that is different. He is our hack.

The Human Rights Commission is an example of the bureaucratic individualism that grips much of what passes for the left in Australia today. Got a problem? Set up a government body to sort it out.

The problem of human rights abuses goes well beyond the power of any government body. Government in Australia is the major human rights abuser.

Did the Human Rights Commission stop the racist Northern Territory intervention?

No. Has it stopped the ongoing genocide against indigenous Australians? No. Black deaths in custody? Imprisonment rates ten times higher among Aborigines than non-indigenous Australians? No. Aboriginal people dying ten years earlier than the rest of us? No.

In fact the HRC supported the Northern Territory intervention.  It isn’t even a band-aid on the cancer that is the capitalist class’s institutionalised racism, apartheid and ongoing genocide in Australia. It is its lapdog.

Has the HRC saved one refugee from Australia’s concentration camps here and on Manus Island and Nauru? No, not one. In fact the existence of the fig leaf might give the impression the Australian ruling class somehow supports human rights even for asylum seekers.

It is all part of the same game that sees Tony Abbott as Minister for Women.

The disparity between men’s and women’s wages and superannuation savings increased under Labor and will continue under the Liberals.  Nothing from the HRC to address this systemic oppression.

What about marriage equality, a basic human right?

What has it done to organise against the anti-bikie laws? The attacks on unions and unionists, including the Australian Building and Construction Commission?

On every one of the main human rights abuses in Australia the HRC has been totally ineffective. It has done nothing to challenge systemic abuses.

Nothing. Zero. Zilch. Not a sausage by way of any winning strategy let alone action from the HRC.

Part of the problem is that human rights are individualised, made the property of certain people, mainly I suspect HRC staff rather than the person whose rights have been abused.

Systemic abuses arise because of the way capitalism is organised and cannot be challenged through good works and individual cases.

If the question of human rights abuses is systemic, what is the answer? Challenging the system that produces racism sexism and homophobia.

For a start, the HRC could call its tens of thousands of stay at home supporters on to the streets to demonstrate for asylum seekers, for Aboriginal Australians. It could campaign for open borders, for a treaty and recognition of prior sovereignty, for massive increases in wages for low paid workers, many, many of them women.

It could join the picket lines of the building unions trying to establish safety standards on sites. It could link arms with East-West tunnel protesters in Melbourne in defence of their rights.

It won’t for it is the respectable face of a system that abuses human rights every day.

There are movements to defend asylum seekers, Aborigines and Torres Strait Islander, for marriage equality. These grass roots campaigns need more people on the ground to join them.

Instead of worrying about Tim Wilson defending free speech for Rupert Murdoch, maybe the time has come for the Human Rights Commission to mobilise the many against the few to defend human rights on the ground and ultimately to challenge the very system that produces human rights abuse after human rights abuse.

The Human Rights Commission: the respectable face of systemic abuse