Thursday 25th of April 2024

raw democracy ...

raw democracy ...

The majority vote by Britons to leave the European Union was an act of raw democracy. Millions of ordinary people refused to be bullied, intimidated and dismissed with open contempt by their presumed betters in the major parties, the leaders of the business and banking oligarchy and the media.

This was, in great part, a vote by those angered and demoralised by the sheer arrogance of the apologists for the “remain” campaign and the dismemberment of a socially just civil life in Britain.  The last bastion of the historic reforms of 1945, the National Health Service, has been so subverted by Tory and Labour-supported privateers it is fighting for its life.

A forewarning came when the Treasurer, George Osborne, the embodiment of both Britain’s ancient regime and the banking mafia in Europe, threatened to cut £30 billion from public services if people voted the wrong way; it was blackmail on a shocking scale.

Immigration was exploited in the campaign with consummate cynicism, not only by populist politicians from the lunar right, but by Labour politicians drawing on their own venerable tradition of promoting and nurturing racism, a symptom of corruption not at the bottom but at the top. The reason millions of refugees have fled the Middle East – first Iraq, now Syria – are the invasions and imperial mayhem of Britain, the United States, France, the European Union and Nato. Before that, there was the wilful destruction of Yugoslavia. Before that, there was the theft of Palestine and the imposition of Israel.

The pith helmets may have long gone, but the blood has never dried. A nineteenth century contempt for countries and peoples, depending on their degree of colonial usefulness, remains a centrepiece of modern “globalisation”, with its perverse socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor: its freedom for capital and denial of freedom to labour; its perfidious politicians and politicised civil servants.

All this has now come home to Europe, enriching the likes of Tony Blair and impoverishing and disempowering millions. On 23 June, the British said no more.

The most effective propagandists of the “European ideal” have not been the far right, but an insufferably patrician class for whom metropolitan London is the United Kingdom. Its leading members see themselves as liberal, enlightened, cultivated tribunes of the 21stcentury zeitgeist, even “cool”. What they really are is a bourgeoisie with insatiable consumerist tastes and ancient instincts of their own superiority. In their house paper, the Guardian, they have gloated, day after day, at those who would even consider the EU profoundly undemocratic, a source of social injustice and a virulent extremism known as “neoliberalism”.

The aim of this extremism is to install a permanent, capitalist theocracy that ensures a two-thirds society, with the majority divided and indebted, managed by a corporate class, and a permanent working poor. In Britain today, 63 per cent of poor children grow up in families where one member is working. For them, the trap has closed. More than 600,000 residents of Britain’s second city, Greater Manchester, are, reports a study, “experiencing the effects of extreme poverty” and 1.6 million are slipping into penury.

Little of this social catastrophe is acknowledged in the bourgeois controlled media, notably the Oxbridge dominated BBC. During the referendum campaign, almost no insightful analysis was allowed to intrude upon the clichéd hysteria about “leaving Europe”, as if Britain was about to be towed in hostile currents somewhere north of Iceland.

On the morning after the vote, a BBC radio reporter welcomed politicians to his studio as old chums. “Well,” he said to “Lord” Peter Mandelson, the disgraced architect of Blairism, “why do these people want it so badly?” The “these people” are the majority of Britons.

The wealthy war criminal Tony Blair remains a hero of the Mandelson “European” class, though few will say so these days. The Guardian once described Blair as “mystical” and has been true to his “project” of rapacious war.

The day after the vote, the columnist Martin Kettle offered a Brechtian solution to the misuse of democracy by the masses. “Now surely we can agree referendums are bad for Britain”, said the headline over his full-page piece.

The “we” was unexplained but understood — just as “these people” is understood. “The referendum has conferred less legitimacy on politics, not more,” wrote Kettle. “ …  the verdict on referendums should be a ruthless one.

Never again.”

The kind of ruthlessness Kettle longs is found in Greece, a country now airbrushed.

There, they had a referendum and the result was ignored.  Like the Labour Party in Britain, the leaders of the Syriza government in Athens are the products of an affluent, highly privileged, educated middle class, groomed in the fakery and political treachery of post-modernism. The Greek people courageously used the referendum to demand their government sought “better terms” with a venal status in Brussels that was crushing the life out of their country. They were betrayed, as the British would have been betrayed.

On Friday, the Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was asked by the BBC if he would pay tribute to the departed Cameron, his comrade in the “remain” campaign. Corbyn fulsomely praised Cameron’s “dignity” and noted his backing for gay marriage and his apology to the Irish families of the dead of Bloody Sunday. He said nothing about Cameron’s divisiveness, his brutal austerity policies, his lies about “protecting” the Health Service. Neither did he remind people of the war mongering of the Cameron government: the dispatch of British special forces to Libya and British bomb aimers to Saudi Arabia and, above all, the beckoning of world war three.

In the week of the referendum vote, no British politician and, to my knowledge, no journalist referred to Vladimir Putin’s speech in St. Petersburg commemorating the seventy-fifth anniversary of Nazi Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union on 22 June, 1941.  The Soviet victory – at a cost of 27 million Soviet lives and the majority of all German forces – won the Second World War.

Putin likened the current frenzied build-up of Nato troops and war material on Russia’s western borders to the Third Reich’s Operation Barbarossa. Nato’s exercises in Poland were the biggest since the Nazi invasion; Operation Anaconda had simulated an attack on Russia, presumably with nuclear weapons. On the eve of the referendum, the quisling secretary-general of Nato, Jens Stoltenberg, warned Britons they would be endangering “peace and security” if they voted to leave the EU.  The millions who ignored him and Cameron, Osborne, Corbyn, Obama and the man who runs the Bank of England may, just may, have struck a blow for real peace and democracy in Europe.

JohnPilger.com – the films and journalism of John Pilger

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © John Pilger, Global Research, 2016

 

alienations...

 

Jeff Sparrow writes bullshit in an article titled:
The liberal left is trapped in a death spiral: progressives need to throw the reset switch



Jeff Sparrow


blah blah blah...

It’s a traditional argument of the right, an entirely conventional fear of the ignorant masses and an entirely conventional plea for their stewardship by their betters. But over the last few days, it’s been articulated again and again by liberals desperately floating ideas as to how a clearly expressed popular sentiment might be overturned.

Nothing could be more disastrous.

If we’re ever to get out of this mess, progressives need to throw the reset switch. How is it possible that a billionaire bigot can present himself as the voice of the people, a brave truthteller speaking up for the little guy? How have we allowed xenophobes and racists to posture as advocates for democracy? How did the left get manoeuvred into taking responsibility for the failures of a market system against which it once defined itself?

We should not give an inch to the bigotry resurging in both Britain and the US, just as we shouldn’t give any ground to the anti-immigrant xenophobes in Australia. But to fight their hatred, we must – as a matter of urgency – articulate a progressive opposition to the conditions breeding such deep alienation.

read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/29/the-liberal-left-is-trapped-in-a-death-spiral-progressives-need-to-throw-the-reset-switch

-----------------------

After his long article talking about a lot of things left of field and how the "left" (say Bill Clinton) in the US expended the prison system, Jeff Sparrow misses the point of Brexit entirely. Sure the progressives are letting themselves be misled... BUT.

No-one (some people are, but the majority isn't) is full-on "anti-immigrants", except when you are likely to become a "minority in your own country", BECAUSE the right mongrels of the Neocons have been wagging wars in countries where they should not be. This has created a massive flux of refugees, who are escaping bombs dropped by various UN nations to please some crazy masters — namely the USA.

Under compassionate grounds Europe has had no choice but to take in more refugees than it can fairly cope with... This adds to the complexity. 

The REAL point here is that we have to stop the waves of bullshit which create the displacement of people. Stop the wars and our righteousness to wage them.

Sure we have to accept refugees, BUT WE DON'T HAVE TO HELP CREATE THEM. And I believe this is the crux of the matter. 

The wars in Libya and Syria have not helped and they have gone down the tube. So why have we been fighting these useless wars? Especially after having realised we had "bought" the dishonest war against Iraq?

Well, there are the official versions which have more concentrated bullshit than in the "Saddam has Weapons of Mass destruction" bulldust. 

We have been told that Gaddafi and Assad are bad people. Are they serious? Really serious? 

And there are the real reasons which continued with the US wanting to crap in Gaddafi's kingdom because he wanted to create a Pan-African Bank independent of the IMF and the World Bank. La Madam Clinton, sure is on the "left" but she is more neoconic than most neocon republicans. She was in charge of inducing "chaos" in Libya... Success.

Now, the US wants to give Syria to the Saudis on a platter for a list of favours, including a Saudi pipeline that would compete with the Russians for the European gas market —furthering the "decline" of Moscow.  Our loony frothed up media sold this war as a religious war, in which the Sunni Wahhabi are at the crux of invasion on behalf of the Saudis through ISIS and a variety of terrorist organisation supported by the USA, called Al Nusra and Al Qaeda. Complicated? yes because we're playing everyone against each other with one hope in mind. A Sunni win. Some people still believe that it is a "civil war" started by a peaceful uprising. Far from it. It has been designed in the bunkers of the Pentagon.

There are other factors at play, including the weakening of Europe having to cope with the "American-created refugees" — a weakening which IS PLANNED and designed to benefit the USA. Hey, add two and two... Brexit is only a hiccup in this process. But some people will see this as a "Russian" plot to dismember Europe. Silliness plus. Russia could not careless whether Europe is united or not, but it will care that Europe becomes part of the reinvigoration of NATO, to please the US Empire. Russia will get ready.

Strangely enough, Russia is more at peace with itself, than the USA or Europe where there is a million conflicting ideas murking the pond. The sanctions against Russia hurt the Europeans far more than they hurt Russia, because the Europeans could not find "new markets" for their perishables, but Russia reinvented some practical solutions to fill the gaps, including trading big with China... Gas, oil, weapons, technology, you name it. Thus we hate the Chinese because the US tell us to, but we still buy our Christmas decorations from there to the tune of major trade imbalance, because we're stupid and love cheap goods. 

The USA is now on an ad-hoc responsive mode rather than a creative mode to benefit humanity by acceptance of diversity. Still, the USA wants to make sure that everyone on the entire planet drinks Coca Cola. This is of course a Euphemism for the invasion of American multinationals everywhere with basically little local benefits, except MORE DEBT. The trick is well-known in diplomatic circles.

Refugees are created by wars. Stop the wars, launch programs for the refugees to help the rebuilding of their countries and stop trying to play god the justicerer in regard to Assad. You cannot please everyone, not even Assad, but at least Assad is far more tolerant that the Saudi-funded ISIS mob or even the "moderate" terrorists that the US are supporting in Syria. Diplomatic lunacy plus. Iraq revisited. Haven't we learnt anything yet? YOU CANNOT TRUST THE AMERICANS, EVEN WITH A BLACK DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT.

Stop supporting the Saudis and the "moderates". Soon things will fall back into peace. Refugees will prefer going back and being their own little master in their own countries, rather than be considered like lepers in European camps.

The Brexit was a mixture of things, including racism, but more than anything it was a note to leaders to stop funding war.