Wednesday 22nd of May 2013

Recent Comments

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 20:21

 

Baffling Rise in Suicides Plagues U.S. Military



After Specialist Freddy Hook, a medic with the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division, killed himself in 2010, the trail of possible causes seemed long.

He had used illegal drugs: Was it the demons of addiction? His rocky relationship with his fiancée? A wrenching deployment to earthquake-ravaged Haiti or the prospect of an impending tour in Afghanistan?

As with most of suicides plaguing the military today, no one will know for sure.

“There are so many factors,” said his mother, Theresa Taylor, of Lafayette, La. “Everything that was important to him was having problems.”

Of the crises facing American troops today, suicide ranks among the most emotionally wrenching — and baffling. Over the course of nearly 12 years and two wars, suicide among active-duty troops has risen steadily, hitting a record of 350 in 2012. That total was twice as many as a decade before and surpassed not only the number of American troops killed in Afghanistan but also the number who died in transportation accidents last year.

Even with the withdrawal from Iraq and the pullback in Afghanistan, the rate of suicide within the military has continued to rise significantly faster than within the general population, where it is also rising. In 2002, the military’s suicide rate was 10.3 per 100,000 troops, well below the comparable civilian rate. But today the rates are nearly the same, above 18 per 100,000 people.

And according to some experts, the military may be undercounting the problem because of the way it calculates its suicide rate.

Yet though the Pentagon has commissioned numerous reports and invested tens of millions of dollars in research and prevention programs, experts concede they are little closer to understanding the root causes of why military suicide is rising so fast.

“Any one variable in isolation doesn’t explain things,” said Craig J. Bryan, associate director of the National Center for Veterans Studies at the University of Utah. “But the interaction of all of them do. That’s what makes it very difficult to solve the problem. And that’s why we haven’t made advances.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/us/baffling-rise-in-suicides-plagues-us-military.html?hp&_r=0&pagewanted=print       

------------------------

 

Read article at top in which I mention the difference between the pride of being a soldier and the realisation of being a killer for wages...:

We used to be proud soldiers, now we are trained killers... The psychology of the trooper has shifted. Even during the great war, chance had a lot to do will killing someone. One rarely aimed a weapon at a specific person, but rather to a target that was a gun emplacement or a torpedo factory... The weapons and our shooting skills were poor... Nowadays, one aims specifically at people, in order to limit the collateral damage. Yet collateral damage occurs and one becomes mortified twice over. 

 

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 17:22

NSW has some of the lowest jobless rates in Australia, a new breakdown of unemployment data by regions shows.

Six out of the top 10 regions in Australia with the lowest unemployment rate for April were from NSW, a CommSec analysis of detailed labour force data from the Bureau of Statistics, released on Thursday, showed.

The unemployment rate was just 2.1 per cent in Sydney's Northern Beaches - the lowest in Australia and a fall from 3.2 per cent in the same month last year.





Please don't let the coalition destroy this reasonable state of affairs in a very difficult world stage, by claiming that a lot of employed people are actually not doing anything much... Abbott wants to sack more than 12000 public servants, he wants to abolish the climate change department — one of the most important department to have in any government — and he wants to reduce the NBN to a pissy trickle to please his master Uncle Rupe... Do not trust one word from Abbott unless he praises the present government's record. Anything else in his reply to budget will be rotten garbage with coating of sweet crap...

Abbott is a deceitful liar...

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 17:02

As well as the unseasonal return of snow, there are flood warnings for Devon, Cornwall and Shropshire, while high winds are bringing power lines, leaving thousands without electricity.
 
There will be no respite in the near future, according to the 
Daily Telegraph. "The winds are expected to die down on Wednesday but the weather will remain wet and cool for this time of year".
 
The inclement conditions are expected to last into next week and beyond and the outlook is bleak according to 
The Times, which notes that there are "ominous weather patterns" on display.
 
"With the jet stream locked into the same southern position that ruined last summer, some forecasters have suggested the outlook is bleak ahead of the Wimbledon tennis tournament and Glastonbury music festival next month."
 
So why is the jet stream so far south? The 
Telegraph says: "One theory is that the jet stream is being pushed south by melting ice from the Arctic, caused by climate change. Global warming also means warmer seas, that means more water evaporating, and hence more moisture in the air and heavier rainfall when it does come."

Read more: http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/uk-weather/53046/uk-snow-may-summer-washout-global-warming#ixzz2TR8K5tQc

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 15:52

I remember in the 1960s being driven on the autobahns by a (rich) friend of mine who kept falling asleep at the wheel. I was in the back seat. His wife next to him kept nudging him regularly to wake him up as we drove between 150 and 170 km/h IN THICK FOG. One could not see 20 metres ahead. I was scared... I don't scare easy but on this day my butt cheeks were so tight they gripped the comfy leather as if it would act as a seat belt (seat belts did not exist in those days)... Of course we were "in the fast lane" and at this amazing speed, before seeing them through the fog, we overtook the red rear lights from trucks and cars in the slow and middle lanes... I was really scared...

And this is what's happening now in regard to global warming. We are driving through fog and the science tells us there is a pile-up waiting for us somewhere ahead and the traffic is becoming more and more congested with extreme "events" — but we're still driving at speed with the intent of dodging the annoying slower cars on "our" fast lane... because as we drive at speed, we've made this lane "ours"...

I have some Liberal (conservative) friends who "believe" in global warming. So far, it has not affected their lives, so on this subject, they still are prepared to accelerate from 200 km/h to 250 km/h on the autobahns in thick fog in their Merc 400 hybrid... despite the warnings and small pile-ups to be noted in the slower lanes. They know there is a "chance" of a massive pile up ahead, but they're relying on their brakes to stop when it's at their convenience at the last second... Already, there are a million dead people on the road, but the spacious ambient comfort inside the vehicle turns the reality of blood "outside" into a quiet console game... What they don't realise is that should they be able to stop just before crashing into the pile-up that one cannot see, some other silly buggers behind them will rear-end them into a ball of fire... 

 

The "good" 10 per cent Liberal (conservatives) I know, those who are fully aware of global warming, are not prepared to reduce our emission of CO2... They know that anthropogenic CO2 is the culprit, but bugger any attempt to reduce our carbon consumption — because the science is unable to tell them if the crash is tomorrow or in 20 years... Meanwhile, they are happy to gamble on the latter date and they have done their bit to save the environment by investing (not buying) in a hybrid car with a 4 litre petrol engine (3.5 litres actually — so there!)...

The others 90 per cent of conservatives have no clue and don't want to know... They drive like my friend in the 160s — asleep at the wheel...

To tell it mildly, ALL THE LIBERALS (Conservatives) are prepared to sacrifice the future of this planet for present comforts. NONE of them want to take the foot off the accelerator pedal... The "good" 10 per cent announce without realising the horror of their twisted thoughts that "they will deal with the problem when it arises"... (meaning WHEN IT AFFECTS THEM DIRECTLY).

Taking the foot off the accelerator would cost money and this is THE ONLY CONSIDERATION ENTERING THEIR BRAINS... 

 

We better start tightening our butt cheeks on the leather of our bicycle seat, as these (may I call them selfish — though they have a heart of gold in regard to tax deductible charity) humans are taking us down with them... 

 

 

by John Richardson on Thu, 2013-05-16 10:19

The former resources minister Ian Macdonald has insisted to a corruption inquiry that he had "total authority" to issue exploration licences without a tender, including to a company backed by former union boss and Labor Party figure John Maitland.

Mr Macdonald, giving evidence before the Independent Commission Against Corruption for the third time in two years on Wednesday, has also maintained that he and Mr Maitland were not friends of any kind, contradicting Labor colleagues from the same faction who had regarded them as "mates".

"We had a cordial relationship," Mr Macdonald said.

"I met him about 15 times in seven years . . . I never went out drinking with him . . . I have never met his children."

But Mr Maitland did meet Mr Macdonald's daughter Sasha, who, the inquiry has heard, attended a celebratory dinner at Catalina when an exploration licence was formally issued to Mr Maitland's company. She went on to secure a job in China through one of Mr Maitland's contacts.

The ICAC inquiry is focusing on the circumstances in which the licence was issued just before Christmas in 2008. It had the effect of creating a windfall of $50 million for the investors behind Doyles Creek Mining when the asset was floated on the stock exchange – including Mr Maitland and Newcastle businessmen Andrew Poole and Craig Ransley.

Mr Macdonald's appearance at the commission marks the end of seven months of public hearings into three separate corruption cases that have also embroiled Labor Party powerbroker Eddie Obeid and his family, and former treasurer Eric Roozendaal.

To date, Mr Macdonald has been accused at the ICAC of three separate acts of corruption.

The first involving a meeting he arranged for accused murderer Ron Medich and a state official, and a prostitute named Tiffanie allegedly arranged for Mr Macdonald in return. The second was his alleged involvement in a "criminal conspiracy" to rig a coal licence tender that generated millions of dollars for the Obeids. And finally, in the current inquiry, for showing "partial" treatment to Mr Maitland.

Counsel assisting the inquiry, Peter Braham, SC, said it was generally accepted in the Rees Labor government of 2008 that if a minister was going to embark on something that would involve the forgoing of state revenues, the matter should be brought to the cabinet.

Mr Macdonald rejected the assertion and said he had never heard Nathan Rees say any such thing.

"I had total authority to deal with exploration licences without going to cabinet," Mr Macdonald said.

The inquiry has heard that the department of mineral resources played very little role in issuing the licence and that the minister's office was Mr Maitland's principal point of contact.

Phone records tendered to the inquiry show Mr Maitland and Mr Ransley dealt with the former minister's personal staff.

Mr Braham also asked Mr Macdonald to accept that the issuing of the licence to Doyles Creek Mining, without a tender, involved an "aberrant process on your part".

"It might have been different in part," Mr Macdonald said, "but I believe it was quite proper."

Mr Maitland claimed on Wednesday that the guidelines for the release of a tenement such as Doyles Creek "provide for flexibility".

Mr Macdonald continues giving evidence on Thursday.

'I Had Total Authority' For Mining Licences: Macdonald

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 09:58

James Packer is pushing for his proposed $1 billion hotel and casino at Barangaroo to contain multimillion-dollar apartments at its highest levels to offer soaring views over Sydney harbour and the CBD and bolster the financial viability of the project.


The detail is contained in the winning design for the proposed development, unveiled on Thursday morning by Mr Packer's company, Crown Limited.
Crown wants to build a tower of up to 60 storeys - around 250 metres high - which would far exceed the current 170 metre limit approved for a hotel on the site.



----------------------

Gus: James' casino is not a casino per se but an apartment block with a gambling den in the basement... or if it was not in the basement, it should be as gambling rooms rarely have windows to the outside world...

 

 

 

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 09:51

Labor MP Michelle Rowland has hit out at the Coalition saying it knew she had a sick child when they refused her request for a ''pair'' to leave Parliament, contradicting statements from senior opposition minister Christopher Pyne.


''I put in what I thought was a reasonable request,'' Ms Rowland told Fairfax Media on Thursday morning. ''I expressly stated it was because my child was sick and I would really appreciate the opportunity to be home with her . . . and I got a reply yesterday that that was declined.''


A ''pair'' is a gentleman's agreement between parties in which a politician excuses themselves from a vote to square the numbers when an opponent cannot attend Parliament for a good reason.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/coalition-knew-about-sick-child-when-it-refused-labor-mp-a-pair-20130516-2jnme.html#ixzz2TPNrTTHT

by Gus Leonisky on Thu, 2013-05-16 09:47

On 21 March 2013, Prime Minister Julia Gillard delivered an eloquent and momentous apology to those hurt and betrayed by forced adoptions.

 

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott also spoke on this significant occasion, but the day was marred by the turbulent events of the non-leadership challenge. Consequently, a crucial part of Abbott’s speech was overlooked.

I’m not talking here about the leader of the Opposition’s insensitive use of the term ‘birth mother’ which upset many in the audience and showed his lack of empathy as well as his apparent inability to read important documents.

It should be noted, however, with respect to that issue, that there is a whole section on the ‘language of adoption’ in the introduction to the Senate’s report: Commonwealth Contribution to Former Forced Adoption Policies and Practices.

1.9 Adoption is a difficult subject to write about in a manner acceptable to everyone affected by it. Forced adoption even more so. Mothers who were forced to give up children for adoption generally reject the terms ‘birth mother’ or ‘biological mother’, and some reject ‘natural mother’. The preferred term is often simply ‘mother’.

 

Therefore, had Mr Abbott, or his speech writer, taken the trouble to read this document he would have been well aware of the potential insult he was delivering to the mothers in that venue and to those around Australia watching on television. (For more on this issue see Barry Everingham’s article on Independent Australia)

 

But my point isn’t about something Mr Abbott said in his speech, it’s about something he didn’t say.

 

The Australian (online) newspaper reported on 21 March 2013 that:

“The Opposition Leader joined Julia Gillard today in apologising to parents and children affected by past forced adoption practices by churches, charities and governments in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s.”

That statement is incorrect, as Mr Abbott, unlike Julia Gillard, did not apologise to parents and children affected by past forced adoption practices by churches.

In his speech [Warning, this link will take you to the Liberal Party website] Mr Abbott stated:

“It should never have been presumed – presumed – that some mothers were incapable of raising their child because, as everyone here knows only too well, there was presumption and there was coercion: by families, by charities, by peers, and by the conditions that governments placed upon people.”

Note that he specifically excludes churches from the list of coercers and by so doing absolves them of responsibility, or at the very least chooses to hide the involvement of religious institutions by subsuming them under ‘charities’.

In The Australian quote above, there is a distinction made between churches and charities, but Mr Abbott doesn’t want to go there. Given what we know about Tony Abbott and his faith we can only conclude that his decision to omit the role of the churches was no mere oversight.

http://www.independentaustralia.net/2013/politics/tony-abbott-and-the-sin-of-omission/

 

 

 

by Gus Leonisky on Wed, 2013-05-15 21:01

The purpose of the image at top is to draw attention to the fact that about 90 per cent of conservatives (Aussie Liberals) don't "believe" in global warming... Proper science has never been one of their forte... They of course believe in god and money (in the reverse order). Both of these beliefs are being inconvenienced by global warming — and an anthropogenic global warming at that... Of course global warming is not a question of belief but one of knowledge.. Math and science that does not involve gambling on a race horse, on the stock market or at a casino near you is of course not worth a penny in any Liberal (conservative) bank account.

Should the aussie conservatives — who of all hypocrisy call themselves Liberals to confuse the reality of their ultra right wing beliefs — take the levers of this country, we would see more major damage to the environment and more of the destruction of the planet surface as a whole...

Climate change or global warming is a most serious matter that will affect future generation of humans and other life-forms for MILLENNIUMS... WE cannot trust the Liberals (conservatives) to understand the problem mostly because I know — I have tested — they don't understand, they don't want to understand and ultimately, THEY DON'T CARE... Hence my rude toon at top....

by Gus Leonisky on Wed, 2013-05-15 20:43

Meanwhile in America, the deficit is near the size of the Australian government entire budget and could have been worse...:

CBO sees brighter economy with budget deficit to plunge to $642 billion this year


By Wednesday, May 15, 5:30 AM


The budget deals of the past two years and a recovering economy are rapidly mopping up the tide of red ink that swept over Washington after the 2007 recession.

After four years of budget deficits in excess of $1 trillion, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office forecast Tuesday that this year’s deficit will plummet to $642 billion, or 4 percent of the nation’s total economic output.

That’s $200 billion lower than the CBO forecast in February. Analysts attributed the sunnier outlook to higher-than-expected tax revenue and about $95 billion in higher payments from mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are profiting from a recovering housing market.

The forecast puts the nation on track for its smallest deficit since 2008, before the recession hit in full force. And the CBO predicts that the gap between revenue and spending will continue to shrink through 2015, when it will fall to just over 2 percent of the economy — well within the bounds of what economists consider to be economically sustainable.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/cbo-budget-deficit-to-plunge-to-642b-this-year-lower-than-expected/2013/05/14/e46112fe-bccb-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_print.html