SearchDemocracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
on an American stalking horse ...
In March 2003 Iraq was invaded by military forces led by the United States, and including other military forces from a range of US allies, including Australia. The ostensible reason for the invasion was the Iraqi government’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). Possession of such weapons is not of itself a legitimate basis for invasion. The Allies therefore had to embellish the claim. Saddam Hussein was going to attack the United Kingdom, with only 45 minutes warning! He was using these weapons against his own people (a claim later repeated to justify the attack on Syria). He posed a threat to peace and stability in the Middle East (irony bypass required here). It was even hinted, none too subtly, that Saddam was one of the persons responsible for the events of 11 September 2001 (“9/11”). There was not a shred of evidence to support any of these allegations. Absence of evidence has never been a deterrent where imperial ambitions are concerned. The invasion of Iraq what about many things, but Saddam Hussein’s alleged WMDs was not one of them.
|
User login |
Recent comments
1 hour 18 sec ago
1 hour 13 min ago
1 hour 47 min ago
4 hours 16 min ago
4 hours 46 min ago
8 hours 40 min ago
8 hours 53 min ago
12 hours 30 min ago
13 hours 3 min ago
19 hours 6 min ago