SearchDemocracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
defining terrorism .....‘If challenged today for a definition of terror, I doubt anyone could produce a sound one that limits the meaning to the acts of those constantly in our headlines. Rather those acts are now reduced to special cases of something a great deal larger. Which was the more ghastly act of terror, 9/11 or the invasion of Iraq? 9/11 killed about 3,000 people and destroyed a building. The invasion of Iraq killed more than 600,000, destroyed the irreplaceable records and artefacts of an ancient civilization, and left a nation of more than 20 million desperate for work, clean water, and electricity. And it should be stressed that although 9/11 came first, there were no connections between these events, except that the one was used as an excuse for the other. When we hear the word terror in the news, we are conditioned to think that only civilians have died, but how is it different now for news of an attack by American forces or a reprisal raid from the Israeli army? It isn’t. We know immediately that civilians die every single time. Indeed, what we often do not know is whether any “bad guys” were killed.’
|
User login |
Recent comments
2 hours 17 min ago
2 hours 55 min ago
3 hours 9 min ago
4 hours 34 min ago
4 hours 45 min ago
4 hours 50 min ago
5 hours 53 min ago
14 hours 21 min ago
15 hours 1 min ago
15 hours 33 min ago