Saturday 14th of November 2026

australia’s bases and assorted defence security is being operated by the chinese....

The security of Australia’s Defence assets has been entrusted to a group with significant ties to the Chinese leadership. Michael West reports on a new disclosure to Parliament. 

Red Alert … oops! After years of huffing and puffing about the security threat from China, it appears our politicians have twigged that the contract for monitoring – and providing security for – Australia’s bases and assorted Defence assets is being operated by none other than … wait for it … the Chinese.

 

Psst. Defence security in Australia is run by the Chinese

 

by 

 

Wilson Security has the contract. Wilson Security is controlled by the Kwok family of Hong Kong, and the Kwok family is in tight with the Communist Party leadership of China.

Be red alert, not red alarmed

According to the “Red Alert” series published by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age on March 7, 2023, Australia could be drawn into a war with China within three years. It is now 2026, so that attack may be imminent if the Nine sources are correct.

It is unlikely they are. Just looking out the window here, and it doesn’t look like the invasion has happened yet.

But before you throw up your hands and exclaim 

If you didn’t laugh, you’d cry, 

this ticklish ownership issue is known to regulators.

According to answers filed to Questions on Notice to Parliament: 

“Wilson Security’s beneficial ownership is through a layered corporate structure. Defence uses a number of sources to verify an entity’s beneficial ownership. Initial advice was obtained from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Please refer to ASIC for further details.”

Phew! It’s with ASIC.

That ‘beneficial ownership is through a layered corporate structure’ is a relief because the Kwok family has significant ties with Beijing. The Kwoks are founders and controlling shareholders of Hong Kong’s Sun Hung Kai Properties (SHKP), which has extensive commercial and political ties with the Chinese government.

Wilson Security won its first contract with the Department of Defence under the Prime Ministership of Tony Abbott on July 10, 2014 and has operated through every successive regime to the present day.

The group has largely flown under the radar, which is a pity because its complicated corporate structure – or in its verbiage ‘layered’ – has enabled the group to be … flexible in relation to its tax arrangements in this country.

While many Australians have been significantly penalised when reaching the pay-stations at its ubiquitous Wilson Parking facilities, Wilson Parking itself has contributed an average of $8.9m a year in income to the Tax Office over the past 11 years of transparency data despite its annual turnover exceeding $1B in 7 of those years.

Better something than nothing.

What they do

Among its Defence security activities, Wilson Security, which is not included in these tax figures (that’s just car parks), provides security officers to defence sites. It has carriage of access control gatehouse operations, providing guards, screening and entry management.

It also provides alarm and monitoring services, cameras and access control systems through a National Operations Centre, and Technology Solutions which include design, installation, integration, and maintenance of access control, CCTV analytics, and remote monitoring systems. 

Further, Wilson delivers mobile and solar CCTV solutions: relocatable, solar-powered CCTV units deployed to remote training areas and hard-to-reach defence land where fixed infrastructure is unavailable. 

The group is sizeable in Australia. Wilson Security operates as an Australian private company under the broader Wilson Group. Alongside security, the group manages Wilson Parking, Wilson Storage, and Wilson Health (Medic One) across the Asia-Pacific region.

The ultimate parent company, Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited, acquired the Wilson Group in 1991. The property and infrastructure giant holds ultimate ownership through offshore holding entities.

As far as regulation is concerned, the Australian Department of Defence’s DISP rules stipulate that foreign-owned businesses can work on Defence contracts if they establish an Australian subsidiary and pass strict Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence (FOCI) and security vetting checks. 

DISP acts as a security vetting framework for companies, ensuring that foreign parent entities cannot access classified Australian information or interfere with sensitive operations.

https://michaelwest.com.au/psst-defence-security-in-australia-is-run-by-the-chinese/

 

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….

 

 

debacle....

 

Surrendering Australia. The AUKUS deception unpackaged

by Doug Cameron

 

“AUKUS represents a failure to recognise the end of US hegemony”, writes Doug Cameron. It makes Australia a target and must be abandoned. 

I have been an active member of the ALP for over 50 years. I am currently joint national patron of Labor Against War, the grassroots Labor movement against AUKUS. 

This year I have been proud to have taken a part in the working secretariat for the AUKUS Public Inquiry. This was a landmark exercise in citizen democracy to engage the public in reviewing the most consequential – and expensive – military decision made by an Australian government in peacetime.

As the Lead Commissioner of the Inquiry, Peter Garrett asked as we launched the inquiry’s report last week, “where was the vigorous debate in the caucus? Where was the vigorous debate in the cabinet? We don’t have any sense that there’s been a debate.”

My party once valued robust debate, 

encouraged critical analysis, and used different points of view to develop sound policies such as nuclear non-proliferation, anti-war sentiment. This enabled Simon Crean’s courageous leadership in opposing sending Australian troops to Iraq in 2003. 

In 1985, the caucus overruled Bob Hawke to reject Ronald Reagan’s request to test MX Missiles in Australian sovereign waters.

Those days are a distant memory.

Debate gives way to incumbency

Many members are disappointed that progressive policies are increasingly subjugated to incrementalism and maintaining incumbency. 

Rubber stamping the AUKUS deal within 24 hours is a case in point. A deal conceived in secret that the AUKUS inquiry has found to be the “worst, most costly and riskiest defence decision ever made by an Australian government”.

The AUKUS pact surrenders our sovereignty by expanding the hosting of US bases, engaging in the “containment” of our most important trading partner China, and turning a blind eye to nuclear weapons on board US submarines, warships and aircraft. 

We have even refused to join with many of our international partners in implementing sanctions against illegal Israeli settlements. All in order not to upset Donald Trump, the US military establishment and their Israeli partners.

We are paying a monumental economic and political price for AUKUS.

Denying and suppressing debate on Palestine and AUKUS at the last national conference will be a Pyrrhic victory for the Labor hierarchy as more and more rank-and-file members justifiably feel ignored, sidelined and divorced from engagement in their own party.

Promoting a false sense of unity at the expense of debate, policy action and building a good society is counter-productive and destined to result in many incumbent Labor politicians losing their seat at the next election.

Progressive patriotism?

Many Labor members are dismayed at the militarisation of our manufacturing industry at the expense of a broad-based industry policy producing socially beneficial goods and products such as modular housing, medical and pharmaceutical goods, advanced manufacturing, renewable energy components, transport infrastructure, and environmental engineering.

It is disgraceful that Labor members who inquire into, express concern or oppose AUKUS are labelled as “appeasers’’ by those who seem intent on reviving a modern-day ALP version of McCarthyism.

Others have retreated to rhetorical nonsense such as “progressive patriotism”, pretending it’s about a range of issues when it is designed to cloak the militarisation of our manufacturing industry. In reality it is about subservience to the US and its military-industrial complex. A shocking place for the Labor Left to end up.

It is understandable that Labor wanted to avoid being “wedged’’ by the Coalition at the 2022 election. Nevertheless, there was an obligation on Labor, upon winning government, to conduct due diligence, engage in open parliamentary debate, and seek political and social licence for AUKUS if they considered this in the national interest. 

History will judge

History will judge AUKUS as a capitulation to US imperialism and hegemony.

Reverting to an historic mindset that requires a powerful protector while relying on the US and UK in what Professor Clinton Fernandes describes as acting as a sub-imperial power, beggars’ belief.

AUKUS should be scrapped and a comprehensive national security strategy capable of gaining political and social licence should be developed.

We need a Royal Commission into the process, 

procedures and implementation of AUKUS.

We need submarines to defend Australia, not attack class submarines designed to take offensive action against China in its own backyard.

A multipolar world

Shallow justifications for AUKUS such as keeping our sea lanes open, protecting undersea communications infrastructure, defending the rules-based order, creating jobs and widening the manufacturing base do not, as the public inquiry has shown, stand up to critical analysis.

AUKUS represents a failure to recognise the end of US hegemony and the emergence of China in a multipolar world. 

It is an example forelock tugging servility, 

the antithesis of sovereignty and independence.

Perhaps because Labor cabinet ministers spend too much time with self-serving ideologues and China hawks, they have embraced AUKUS and the consequential subservience to the United States. This betrays long-held Labor values epitomised by John Curtin’s determination to act as an autonomous nation rather than a subordinate Dominion.

Government members are now faced with attempting to justify building public housing at taxpayers’ expense for 2300 active-duty US sailors, civilian staff, defence contractors and military dependents while disadvantaged Australians are homeless with many couch surfing or living on the street. 

A radioactive legacy

Many poor and middle-class Australians are battling to maintain their standard of living while the government recklessly commits $368 billion to AUKUS plus an estimated $180 billion to store and protect highly enriched uranium waste. 

No country, has solved the storage problem. 

This will be a radioactive legacy left by the current Labor for future generations

The public inquiry report should be compulsory reading for all Australians who value peace, independence, sovereignty and engagement with our largest and most important trading partner China. 

It is also compulsory reading for those who want a grown-up relationship with the United States.

It was an honour to be involved in the establishment and operation of the AUKUS inquiry. We owe the Commissioners a debt of respect and gratitude.

AUKUS makes Australia a target

AUKUS is a failure of government, a failure of democracy, a failure of due diligence and demonstrates a lack of political courage to change a faltering, massively expensive and increasingly unpopular policy. AUKUS makes Australia a nuclear target.

It is never too late to do the right thing. 

As the Prime Minister’s mentor, lion of the left and peace activist the late Tom Uren said: “If you believe in your heart that a cause is just, you must fight for it because today’s unfashionable stance often becomes tomorrows accepted wisdom.’’

An increasing number of Australians, including Labor members recognise Tom’s wisdom and the need to fight against the AUKUS debacle. 

https://michaelwest.com.au/surrendering-australia-the-aukus-deception-unpackaged/

 

READ FROM TOP.

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….