NavigationSearchRecent Commentsthe fattest country in the world... in masterpiece in obesity... 9 hours 36 min ago betting in a mafia-run den... in greed on credit ..... 10 hours 14 min ago a leaky sieve... in greeks and edges... 11 hours 9 min ago iran helps syria while west help rebels... in EU tightens 'stranglehold' on Assad regime... 11 hours 11 min ago a duo of comics, not leadership material though... in the tony & joe show ..... 14 hours 17 min ago the purpose of shock jocks.... in The night of nights... 14 hours 26 min ago occupy versus plunder... in the end of the battle for the battlers... 15 hours 33 min ago fighting back... in fighting against all odds... 16 hours 53 min ago pyne the liar... in special parliamentary strength... 1 day 1 hour ago disabled coalition... in new menus... 1 day 11 hours ago Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
democracy in peril...
From Elizabeth Farrelly It may be, as one correspondent wrote last week, that advertising works on the "80/80 principle", the assumption that 80 per cent of Australians have an IQ average of 80. Now I'm fine with stupidity in advertising. Indeed, I expect nothing less - isn't that why God gave us the mute button? But what makes the 80/80 thought especially gripping - as in, by the throat - is how much it explains that branch of advertising we call politics. ... Democracy is very close to our hearts. So close that we go to war in order to impose it on those too weak or benighted to grab it for themselves. But democracy, the tyranny of the majority, may yet prove an own goal for humanity, mainly because of the weird trick it does with scale; allowing us all to pursue our own happiness as if we were the only ones on the planet. Allowing us to act like a vast family of solipsistic only children, steadfastly voting for lower taxes and higher services. Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/democracy-is-blocking-intelligence-20110420-1dos3.html#ixzz1K6RDqcNzGus: I like the blue ones...
|
User login |
framing aristotle...
From Ross Gittins
...
So what's the answer? Schwartz and Sharpe say that, though we will always need rules and rewards in the running of institutions, increasing the emphasis on rules and incentives discourages and diminishes the third, more elusive element needed to make institutions work well: what Aristotle called phronesis and translates as practical wisdom.
People exercising practical wisdom use their skills and experience to achieve to the best of their ability the ''telos'' or true purpose of their activity. Practical wisdom involves finding the right way to do the right thing in the particular case you are dealing with.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/looking-to-aristotle-for-a-guide-on-reform-20110419-1dnbg.html#ixzz1K6SuiKtm
Gus: did I mention Aristotle before?...
media has driven politicians away from serious debate...
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 28/04/2011
Reporter:
Former finance minister Lindsay Tanner says the media has driven politicians away from serious debate and towards spin and gimmicks.
TranscriptLEIGH SALES: The former finance Minister, Lindsay Tanner, was one of the so called "Gang of four" who ran the Rudd Government. He quit at the last election, citing family reasons. Caucus minutes leaked last year claim that he was opposed to Labor's dumping of the emissions trading scheme.
Now Mr Tanner has written a book called 'Sideshow: Dumbing Down Democracy'.
Lindsay Tanner, in your new book you write that Australia and its people deserve much better than the carefully scripted play acting that now dominates our nation's politics. What do you mean?
LINDSAY TANNER, FORMER FINANCE MINISTER: We got to a situation where spin, robotic scripting, all of the things that you've heard lots of complaints about over the past few years I think have seriously distorted the picture of politics even more distorting than usual, that is conveyed through the media. I've tried in this book Sideshow to ask why is this happening. The answer is politicians are reacting to how the media portrays them. They're getting more and more defensive because of "gotcha journalism" and more and more are drifting into a world of flimflam and stunts and gimmicks, announcables and spin, both to protect themselves and also to stay in the media. So you get a toxic interaction between politicians and the media that is driving the Australian political process further and further away from issues, from the national interest, from serious political debate.
LEIGH SALES: But that casts politicians in a pretty passive position.
LINDSAY TANNER: Look, they're not entirely passive, that's true, and certainly responsibility for these problems is, I think, ultimately shared between politicians, media and the people who vote for them and who watch and read and listen to the media, the whole community. It is possible that a big political dividend will come to somebody who decides to try to break out of these shackles, but there are endless examples of where distortion, trivialising, misrepresenting by the media sends signals to politicians about what they'll get punished for and what they'll get rewarded for.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2011/s3202864.htm
the man of steel rebukes the US...
After years of declaring he stood for "truth, justice and the American way," Superman has provoked the ire of rightwingers by threatening to renouce his US citizenship.
In the latest issue of Action Comics, which went on sale on Wednesday, the Man of Steel decides to take the step after he intervenes in a protest against the Iranian government.
After the Islamic regime brands his non-violent protest as an act of war taken on behalf of the US president, the DC comic hero says he will renounce his citizenship before the United Nations.
"I'm tired of having my actions construed as instruments of US policy," he says.
Although Superman never actually renounces his citizenship in the story, conservative commentators reacted with disgust.
In a blogpost at The Weekly Standard, senior writer Jonathan Last questioned Superman's beliefs, now that he seems to have rejected the United States. "Does he believe in British interventionism or Swiss neutrality?" Last wrote. "You see where I'm going with this: If Superman doesn't believe in America, then he doesn't believe in anything."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/apr/29/superman-threatens-renounce-us-citizenship
a long way to go, still...
Since the 1970s, as the veteran British socialist Tony Benn has observed, political power has effectively been transferred from the ballot box to the wallet and all over the world, democracy - real, true democracy - as opposed to the banker-friendly faux-democracy aggressively promoted by the US State Department and neo-con think tanks, has been on the retreat. That is until now.
Some may not see the connection between the toppling of a decrepit dictator in the Nile Valley, the Arab spring in general, anti-austerity riots in Greece and the fall from grace of News International, but I would argue there's a strong one. Namely that all are manifestations of the growing public anger against undemocratic and unaccountable elites across the globe.
Read more: http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/82129,news-comment,news-politics,2011-the-year-we-took-on-the-unaccountable-elites-revolution-murdoch-arab-spring#ixzz1TCyi36j1
In australia, at present, the anger is directed at the wrong mob... for a few silly reasons. The lying ritewingnutters have a strong bastion of lying media spruikers on their side (Murdoch included: he "controls" 70 per cent of the press), while the people of the left, who should be supporting their side, are wishy-washy about essential hard policies, due to their "personal" idealistic expectations, making the crap of the ritewingnutters too easy...
See toon at top...