Tuesday 30th of April 2024

congress by candlelight...

candlelight

picture by Gus

There's dumb, there's dumber and then there are the House Republicans—nearly all of them—who voted this morning to set the U.S. back on energy efficiency. By a quick voice vote, the House approved an amendment that would prevent funds from a 2012 spending bill to be used to implement federal light bulb standards. The amendment came after a similar separate bill failed to garner a two-thirds supermajority earlier this week in the House—although it did win a simple majority and all but 10 Republicans in the House voted for it, along with five Democrats.

The amendment stands little chance of surviving the Senate—not to mention President Obama's veto powers—so today's voice vote was mostly symbolic, like so much else Congress seems to be devoting its time to these days. But that symbolism is, frankly, terrible and stupid. What's all the more amazing is that Republicans are attacking a light bulb efficiency standard that was passed in bipartisan fashion back in 2007, and signed by President George W. Bush—a man who will not exactly be remembered as the "environmental president." The bill requires bulbs to burn 25% to 30% less energy by 2012 and 65% less energy by 2020. It does not—as conservatives have argued again and again—ban incandescent bulbs. What the law does is mandate better-performing bulbs, be they CFC, LED or yes, even incandescent—and in fact, Phillips and other manufacturers are already making more efficient incandescent bulbs. Light bulb-makers aren't opposing the new standards, and they seem more than capable of meeting them.


Read more: http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/07/15/why-fighting-energy-efficient-light-bulbs-is-so-stupid/#ixzz1SMIlJlZV

the U.S. Just Wastes...

I'm always cautious about overpraising China. That reluctance is partially due to the experience of having lived in Hong Kong for five years in the last decade. I saw up close the amazing and inspiring story of that country's economic growth, which has led to hundreds of millions rising out of poverty. I also saw the negatives: air pollution from southern China's factories turned the Hong Kong's harbor sky into a sea of smog. Even now, while China's leaders are admirably investing billions in alternative power and energy efficiency, coal plants are being built every week throughout the country, and its major cities remain environmental catastrophes. And there's the small matter of political repression. Far-sighted planning can be a lot easier when one party has a monopoly on political power.


Read more: http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/03/04/while-china-cuts-energy-waste-the-u-s-just-wastes/#ixzz1SMLlMGev

drop in demand...

One of Australia's largest electricity providers says it is experiencing a "historic" cut in households' demand for power.

Ausgrid, which powers much of New South Wales, has announced demand for its electricity by regular households has fallen 2 per cent each year for the past four years.

It is the first time the company has seen a fall in demand since the 1950s.

"If you go right back to the 1950s, residential consumption has continued to rise year on year, and in around 2006, we saw that plateau," Ausgrid energy efficiency specialist Paul Myors said.

Ausgrid says the drop is caused by consumers switching to energy efficient hot water systems and light bulbs after seeing their power bills go through the roof.

"One example where we have seen most strongly is with residential hot water because we often separately meter this in households," Mr Myors said.

"We've seen reductions even greater than 2 per cent, even up to 8 per cent per year," he said.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-15/power-consumption-makes-historic-drop/2839394