NavigationSearchRecent Commentson the right track... in war drunks... 3 hours 9 sec ago meanwhile, pence is homeless... in will wilkinson, History, virgins, god and pisspots at the white house... 3 hours 21 min ago a meritorious but not sufficient act to prevent the psychos... in war is peace... 3 hours 33 min ago but don't worry, the banks are laughing... in now in charge of printing money... 6 hours 59 min ago did we mention "agents provocateurs"? in questions arise for holding congress' open day when the members were discussing joe biden becoming president... 7 hours 17 min ago a step in the right direction... in war drunks... 15 hours 45 min ago of masks and masks... in please wear your mask in mask designated areas... 16 hours 9 min ago big tech propaganda... in will wilkinson, History, virgins, god and pisspots at the white house... 18 hours 10 min ago not sleeping in the same bed... in the way the economy works... 1 day 3 hours ago honestly... in mutual meddlings... 1 day 9 hours ago Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
who is shagging who?...With the Trade Union Royal Commission in turmoil after details of counsel coaching Kathy Jackson were revealed. Peter Wicks considers who is scratching whose back and who is just itchy. I would like to say I was shocked and appalled at revelations in yesterdaysThe Australian that Kathy Jackson was not only helped through the Royal Commission, but advised also. However I am even further from being shocked by this than Joe Hockey not being able to achieve a budget surplus. Huge congratulations are due to Pamela Williams and Jared Owens for some brilliant journalism. It’s not that the revelations aren’t shocking – they are – it is only that this was something I had expected and suspected all along but could not confirm. Williams has answered some of the questions I asked with answers I anticipated in November 2014.
|
what bias?
The article confirms that Jackson worked closely with the Royal Commission, as did her partner Michael Lawler, she was given advance notice on what she would be facing questions on and tips to prepare for them. She was also given scope to attack her factional rivals and it was suggested that she also attack the sections of the media who were bothering her.
The Commission also suggested,she attack Labor Party figures and, in particular, Bill Shorten.
Bias? What bias?
Those that say this gives further weight to the argument of bias and the Commission as a taxpayer-funded witch-hunt miss the point. This does not give the allegations extra weight, it confirms them as undisputed fact.
The article quotes Eric Abetz telling Bill Shorten that he needs to get “on board” with the Commission. Why on earth would anybody climb aboard a train that was off the rails, on fire and headed for a cliff?
The hide of Abetz to say anything at any rate given it was exposed long ago that either he or his office was in regular contact with Jackson after her phone records appeared as evidence here all the way back in July 2012. Perhaps someone in the Senate should ask Abetz about the amount of contact he or his office has had with Jackson or Lawler since the Commission commenced. That could prove interesting indeed.
read more: https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/kathy-jackson-and-turc-waking-up-with-fleas,8142
the sick world of the MMMM (mediocre mass media de mierda)...
With the Federal Court decision in the Fair Work Commission action against Craig Thomson due to be handed down today in Melbourne, get ready for the media to pile in on Craig Thomson — again. Peter Wicks reports.
With Tony Abbott and the Coalition in free-fall mode in the polls, the Trade Union Royal Commission’s integrity in the toilet, and more details of dodgy dealings being done by Kathy Jackson and her partner Michael Lawler, things must be glum for Tony Abbott, Eric Abetz, George Brandis and the Jacksonville crew.
Luckily, they have a sure-fire way of tipping the balance back in their favour — a tried and true method that has worked for years. A tactic that is as simple as those who apply it and a tactic that’s only beauty is in its simplicity.
That tactic is called the "Thommo bash".
It’s simple, really: just mention Craig Thomson’s name in the same sentence as words like fraud, brothel, prostitute, hooker and theft and let the predictable pursuant prurient public outrage do the rest. However, the most important word that would also be in that sentence is “alleged”, but you can be sure it would be the least emphasised word.
Other words that should be in that sentence but won’t make an appearance are words like innocent, disproved, cleared — as well as two other words: “not guilty”.
As the week ends, those on the Jacksonville bandwagon will once again have an opportunity to take the proverbial dump on Craig Thomson as he tries to rebuild his life.
The very different worlds of Craig Thomson and Kathy Jackson@madwixxy https://t.co/hlExHh5x0h
— lynlinking (@lynlinking) April 7, 2015Today (11/9/15), the findings in the civil matter against Thomson are to be handed down and are not likely to be favorable towards him.
The reasons for this would seem to be:
The thing to remember in all of this is that Thomson has fought these charges twice in court during his criminal trial and been found not guilty.
Also worth noting is that the union money used for "campaign purposes" was part of a national anti-WorkChoices campaign being run by affiliated unions. The bulk of this went into sponsorship of a Central Coast NRL team and game. This was not used for Craig Thomson's election campaign at all, as has been alleged. One match was actually called the "HSU Your Choices At Work Cup", not the "Vote Thomson Cup" that the spin would indicate.
Read more: https://independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/get-ready-for-latest-round-of-the-mainstream-media-craig-thomson-bash,8152
Meanwhile The Australian (merde-och mass mediocre media outfitter to the Turdy government) is telling us that the ABC 4-corners program is going to get a tell all story from Kathy Jackson and her mate Michael Lawler at the QC's country mansion which, as I understand it, they will inherit when the rich QC, David Rofe, dies...
It is very tainted...
It is a very tainted submission from the TURC and one should smells a big rat. The submission places Craig Thomson, Michael Williamson and Kathy Jackson in the same basket of thieves. Craig Thomson might have misused not quite an amount of $6,000 of union funds over three years, possibly by not understanding the limits placed on what was "Union business" and personal usage of a credit card... The other two characters are responsible for stealing $2.4 millions. There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE. One should not have them in the same petty wagon.
Thomson went through hell, because he was the target of political nasty games from Tony Abbtt whose mate Michael Lawler was the major mud thrower, while Michael Lawler himself was in bed with Kathy Jackson — whom, one must add, a so-called reputable journalist pumped for information on Thomson to do Tony Abbott's bidding. Thomson was rendered bankrupt and sentenced to 12 months jail while Jackson is still at large...
So this should be analysed very carefully:
The submission from counsel assisting the commission Jeremy Stoljar SC released on Friday, says some senior management operated with “a sense of complete entitlement in respect of the use of members’ money”.
The submission also notes that the Victoria police, operating independently but in support of the commission, is undertaking a criminal investigation into Jackson’s activities while at the union.
Stoljar has recommended the commissioner, Dyson Heydon, make findings against Jackson and Thomson, as well as the former HSU boss Michael Williamson, that reflect that they had been “personally responsible” for the misappropriation of more than $2.4 million of HSU members’ money.
“The HSU has undergone many difficulties and tribulations over the last few years. Many – though not all – of those difficulties centre around three senior figures in the Union: Michael Williamson, Craig Thomson and Katherine Jackson,” Stoljar said.
All three former officials had faced allegations of misappropriation of union funds that had been the subject of criminal and civil investigations and proceedings, both concluded and ongoing.
Williamson was accused of defrauding the HSU and the New South Wales Union by the provision of false invoices in the amount of $938,000, the submission notes.
In the case of Thomson, the submission said, allegations had resulted in criminal charges concerning misuse of HSU funds for personal expenses, for which he was initially convicted of counts with a total value of $24,000, reduced to $5650 on appeal
read more: http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/oct/02/unions-commission-given-damning-assessment-of-former-hsu-officials
Bold from Gus... The media, especially the merde-och press first instigated that Thomsom had stolen more than half a million, which WAS PROVEN COMPLETELY FALSE. RATBAGs...
a bizzare 4-c...-struck and violin of a hitchcock thriller.
The term "c--t-struck" left the lips of the embattled Vice President of the Fair Work Commission Michael Lawler - a man on a $430,000 taxpayer-funded salary.
Lawler used the phrase to describe how he feared he would be portrayed when his relationship with former head of the Health Services Union, Jackson, was made public. Jackson was found guilty in a civil case that ended in August of misusing her position as head of the union to fraudulently gain financial advantage and was ordered to pay about $1.4 million.
"I'll be characterised as that scumbag, crook, fraudster, and, at the very best, somebody who's been bewitched by an evil harridan, namely Kathy [Jackson]," Lawler told ABC journalist Caro Meldrum-Hanna.
"That I'm c-nt-struck and that I have been utterly taken in by somebody who's a serious crook," he said.
Though the c-word is common gutter parlance, the -struck suffix is lesser known.
"C--t-struck: to be in a state of having an irrational and strong emotional and physical attraction to a woman," according to Urban Dictionary.
Unlike the 'Did he? Didn't he?' drama that followed cabinet Minister Christopher Pyne's possible c-word slip during parliamentary Question Time in 2014, there was no doubt about this.
That's because ABC didn't bleep out the profanity.
The closed-caption archivists at Tveeder didn't miss it either:
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/the-vulgar-pinnacle-of-a-bizarre-four-corners-with-kathy-jackson-and-michael-lawler-20151020-gkd3b0.html#ixzz3p3Ia3ofc
Follow us: