Wednesday 21st of August 2019

a trickster sceptic's ways to get your money...

bjorn and bill
Like me, on Linkedin, you may have received a link to Lomborg's sceptic views on the Paris Agreement COP21. 

Lomborg's rabble sounds very impressive. The coiffed-Danish pastry makes some very strong points to tell you that Paris only agreed on one per cent of what SHOULD really BE DONE. Has Bjorn seen the light?

But of course, for a modest fee (not mentioned in his tirade, but read between the lines) Lomborg can help do the rest — the 99 per cent effort needed to save the planet should you give him the cash. One can sense that the coiffed-Danish pastry is also trying to engross himself with the Gates Foundation on developing RENEWABLES. Very noble indeed. Pass the hat. The Gates have more cash they know what to do with.

As well Lomborg tells the rest of the world that the Third World does not need solar panels. Here, smell a rat. Most likely that's where a cartoonist ignoramus like Bill leak, under the influence of the "global-warming-is-crap" Murdocrats at The Australian, got his info from (see we expect more from cartoonists...). The Third World says so himself, apparently: The Third World wants education, water, loos, health planning, and family planning way before solar panels... 
Of course the solar panels could help provide electricity that would help the development of education, water, loos, health planning, and family planning, but this is not seen by Lomborg's view nor by the Third World which to say the least only sees electricity spewing out of chimneys.

Slowly but surely, Lomborg tries to suck you in a vortex of slight and gross misinformation, with a massive porkie from the start. He says:

It is widely accepted that to keep temperature rises below 2°C, we have to reduce CO₂ emissions by 6,000Gt.

This of course is a lot of rubbish. Nothing of the sort is widely accepted.

6,000Gt could roughly be the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere altogether, including that necessary for photosynthesis in plants. I have no idea where Lomborg gets this figure from, in regard to his human addition of EXTRA CO2, and I don't want to know. 

I think he tries to stand on a fake rotten soapbox to demonise the emission cuts pledge of "56 Gt" (a figure which is hard to compound from the fog of Paris) of CO2 by 2030 by the countries of the world, in Paris. He wants to prove that Paris is a crock and that we need to do 99 per cent more reduction. Give him the cash: he knows how to do it! This is sneaky. This is stupid. Lomborg is an idiot who tries to make sense but only incriminates himself as a trickster, fibber and ignoramus.

The real figures are a bit more modest: Since 1850, humanity has added about 1,500 Gt of CO2 in the system. Some of it has been absorbed in oceans and has been recycled by plants. the left-over of extra CO2 would be about 1,000 Gt in the atmosphere. This is enough to drive temperature increase by 6 to 9 degrees C by 2250. We need to do something.

According to more reputable sources, the world spews about 30 to 40 Gt of CO2 per annum.

So should we wish to bring back temperatures to 1850 level, we would need to SCRUB out about 1,000 Gt CO2 from the atmosphere AND reducing our emissions to zero. To limit the temperature at 2 degrees C by 2100, we have to reduce our emissions to zero and scrub about 500 Gt of CO2 from the atmosphere. This can be more than painful if badly done. 

And that's not going to happen. 

So Lomborg is right. We are not doing enough. But the agreement demands reductions that could be quite savage on the fossil fuel economy which is basically 95 per cent of what we do — from plastics to vapour trails in the sky. Put your thinking hats on, but please do not pay cash to Lomborg's ignorance and grandstanding.

To a great extend, the development of education, water, loos, health planning, and family planning in the Third World is already happening, despite cultural sensitivities having to be managed. Having solar panels/batteries providing cheap electricity would help in implementing these programs FASTER.

Meanwhile the fossil fuel industry and providers of CO2 comforts in the developed world HAVE TO PACK THEIR BAGS. 

Funding green energy is necessary. But I trust some of the "green energy" Lomborg and the Ecomodernism have in mind includes nuclear solution, AS well as GM crops, and a host of other stuff WE DO NOT NEED... 

Lomborg is a trickster. Manage the world's problems without him.

Gus Leonisky
Your trusted local source of validity.


insuring higher risks...

With climate change and global gas emissions taking the main stage as a central policy issue for governments around the world, it was curious that one of Australia's largest general insurers Suncorp was silent on the ramifications of climate-related weather events on the day it was forced to downgrade its profit forecast.

To be fair the issues that have played into a weakening outlook for Suncorp are not all about weather-related events, the falling Australian dollar has increased the insurer's costs, while bigger than anticipated large losses in commercial insurance and increased claims frequency in compulsory third party insurance have also been in the mix.

But the $75 million increase in the natural hazards allowance that has come about from last year's run of weather events – in particular a number of devastating hail storms – are taking their toll as they work through the insurer's books.

Read more:
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

the food chain is moving south...

Australia's plankton population, a vital key in the human food chain, has moved 300 kilometres south in 30 years, new research has found.

Scientists attributed the shift to the warming oceans caused by climate change.

In some regions there was also a shift from cold-water to warm-water plankton species.

Key points:
  • Plankton produces about half the oxygen humans breathe
  • Determines numbers of fish, marine mammals and turtles in a region
  • Populations have moved 300km south in 30 years
  • Scientists attribute move to climate change


The Plankton 2015 report from the CSIRO is based on data from the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), which looks at why plankton is important to ocean health.

The report's lead author, Dr Anthony Richardson, said how much plankton there is, and where it is, determines how many fish, marine mammals and turtles are in the sea.

absolutely fabulously...


The Australian released a statement to Crikey saying it stood by the cartoon, which it said ridiculed climate change activists, not Indian people, which their readers would have understood.

“We stand by this cartoon and believe it is a strong example of Bill Leak and The Australian’s exercise of its commitment to freedom of speech. The cartoon does not intend to ridicule Indians but the climate change activists who would send poor people solar panels rather than give them something they need – cheap power, aid and a hand up,” the statement said.

“This has been a long-running theme throughout the Paris conference.

“Those following the debates in and around the Paris conference run in our pages would have realised the target of the cartoon was not Indians. It was quite the opposite. Our readers would have – and, in fact, have – understood this".

read more:


Fabulously spun... I am humbly mortified that I am dumber than the average readership of The Australian — mostly because I believe we need to do something about global warming, contrarily to the readers of The Australians as instructed by the Murdoch Masters.... All I wrongly saw in this glorious Bill Leak cartoon was Indians trying to do something stupid with solar panels. My apologies for not seeing the stupidity of giving them solar panels for local electricity supplies, when they deserve to have smoking chimneys coal powered steam driven turbines with 100 kilometres of poles and wires feeding the multitude with cheap discounted and stolen electricity— Oops this is denigrating. I did not mean to misrepresent the general honesty of Indians, only that of journalists who reports daily on people steeling from the grid in third world countries. 

Power could not come cheaper and cleaner than through solar panels and wind turbines since they would be given away...


a coal pill that one cannot swallow anymore...

“The world is being sold a lie, yet most people seem to accept the lie, even if they do not believe it,” Ricketts warned. “The UN has successfully brainwashed most of the world’s population such that scientific evidence, rational analysis, enlightened thinking and common sense no longer matter.”

“You might be relieved that the agreement is weak,” he went on. “Don’t be. The words and legal basis no longer matter. Fossil fuels are [being] portrayed by the UN as public enemy number one. We are witnessing a power bid by people who see the democratic process as part of the problem and have worked out ways to bypass it.”

Ricketts is an affable and respected figure on the Brussels lobby scene, and campaigners suggested that stress and industry desperation may have played a part in his outburst.

when people like lomborg mention the third world...

Is this what they have in mind in order to burn more coal and make electricity (read at top)? Not even a country like Australian can afford this caper:



India has agreed to buy a high-speed bullet train from Japan, in an attempt to transform its creaking rail system. Mohan Guruswamy wonders whether it makes sense.

Last week Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's cabinet cleared a $14.7bn (£9.6bn), 650km (403 miles) long bullet train system linking the western Indian cities of Mumbai and Ahmedabad, which will cut travel time on the route from eight hours to two.

"This enterprise will launch a revolution in Indian railways and speed up India's journey into the future. It will become an engine of economic transformation in India," Mr Modi said.

But will it?

To be sure the BJP's election manifesto released in April 2014 promised a 5,846km (3632 miles) "high speed train network (bullet train)" linking Delhi, Chennai (Madras), Kolkata (Calcutta) and Mumbai. Interestingly, it didn't include Ahmedabad, the capital of Mr Modi's native state, Gujarat.

Creaky infrastructure

Indian Railways is the third largest railway network in the world. It has come a long way since its first passenger train service began on 16th April 1853, when 14 carriages carrying about 400 guests left Bori Bunder in Mumbai.

read more:

... And we give two dollars fifty every six months to help the poor in India — with a great sense of charity...


solar apology...

Despite some legitimate concerns, Woodland became the subject of ridicule as some of the public’s remarks went viral on websites such as Huffington Post, Ars Technica, and Daily Kos aggregated their remarks (one headline read: “North Carolina citizenry defeat pernicious Big Solar plan to suck up the Sun”). Since the meeting, phones haven’t stopped ringing at Woodland’s city hall and, according to Woodland’s mayor, Kenneth Manuel, have turned into a distraction from the government’s daily operations.

read more:


Had Gus reposted the nasty articles from some of the sensationalist press, including the Huffingpuffingpost, Gus offers his sincere apologies. A town is entitled to have green grass as well as solar panel... Woodland, you're a star.

Indian solar panels...


From the BBC
Whatever happened to all the talk of international co-operation to tackle climate change that we heard during the climate conference in Paris just a few months ago?
That is what many environmentalists are asking after the United States delivered a damaging blow to India's ambitious solar power programme this week.
In response to a US complaint, a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel has ruled that India's National Solar Mission breaches trade rules.
It judged that India's policies on buying locally made solar power equipment discriminates against imports."The ink is barely dry on the UN Paris Climate Agreement, but clearly trade still trumps real action on climate change," Sam Cossar-Gilbert of Friends of the Earth International said in a statement.
But is the decision really as damaging as many commentators seem to think?
Let's start at the beginning.

Solar centrepiece
One of the biggest achievements at the Paris climate change conference was drawing India into the architecture of international climate agreements.

It refused to commit to a ceiling on carbon dioxide emissions but did promise big increases in the carbon efficiency of the economy - the amount of carbon emitted per unit of GDP.
A key part of that commitment was the promise of huge investment in renewable technologies, including a vast increase in solar power.
India said it would add 100 GW of solar capacity by 2022.
That's more than the current solar capacity of the world's top five solar-producing countries combined.And - you guessed it - the National Solar Mission was the centrepiece of the whole shebang.
India's National Solar Mission
  • Launched on 11 January 2010 by then PM Manmohan Singh
  • Targets ramping up India's solar power capacity to 100 GW by 2022
  • Aims to reduce the cost of solar power generation in the country through long-term policy, aggressive research and development (R&D), and domestic production of critical raw materials, components and products
  • Aims to make India a global leader in solar energy

But while the US was carefully reeling India into the climate talks it had simultaneously lodged a complaint with the WTO, arguing that India's solar programme created unfair barriers to the import of US-made solar panels.

It is certainly true that India's plans include a "buy local" policy.
The Solar Mission is explicitly designed to make India one of the biggest players in the rapidly growing international solar industry.
Indeed, developing solar is a key thrust of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's signature "Make in India" policy.

Pros and cons
And here's where the interesting economic arguments come in.

Because the presumption in most of the commentaries I've read on this is that buying local content is necessarily a good thing.
Take a look at this article in the online environmental magazine Grist, or this piece in the Huffington Post, which maintains: "The ruling shows that decades-old, over-reaching trade rules are out of sync with the global challenge to 100% clean energy."
Lots of economists would say that that is muddle-headed.
Think about what the "buy local" rules are really about.
They are there to shield local capitalists - Indian-based solar panel companies - from competition from abroad.
That means one of two things.
Secure behind the protective barrier, they get to pocket extra profits.
Alternatively they are able to run less efficient businesses.
Either way the people who buy the panels lose out because they end up paying more.
The case is made very well in this Forbes article, which argues that the WTO rules are there to right an inherent imbalance between producers and consumers.

Environmental benefits
The problem is that local businesses tend to feel very strongly indeed about creating that comfortable competition-free space, so they lobby government hard for it.
Their customers aren't so motivated to make a fuss so the manufacturers tend to win out.

That's where the WTO agreements come in, tilting the trade disputes like this in favour of consumers.That is why - runs the argument - the WTO ruling against India will actually have huge environmental benefits.
The WTO is ensuring that India's solar ambitions are achieved in the most efficient way possible because the Indian businesses that want to generate solar power get to buy the cheapest solar panels.That is certainly what the American solar industry says.
"This decision helps us bring clean energy to the people of India, as that nation's demand for electricity rapidly grows," Dan Whitten of the Solar Energy Industries Association told PV-Tech magazine.India, of course, disagrees.
It argues that developing an indigenous solar industry will in time boost international competition and therefore reduce the price of solar panels for everyone.
And no doubt India will be tempted to point to the hypocrisy in US trade policy.
While the US argues for unfettered free markets in international forums like the WTO, it doesn't practice what it preaches at home.
Half of all US states have subsidies for renewables.
Perhaps India should file a counter-complaint with the WTO against the US.

See toon (and the stupid Bill Leak cartoon within it) and article at top.


bill leak is an idiot...


Bill Leak is an idiot...

Bill Leak, the cartoonist, is an idiot...

A political cartoon portraying an Aboriginal man with a beer can and not remembering his son's name is an "attack" on Indigenous Australians, a community leader says.

The cartoon by Bill Leak was published by The Australian newspaper on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children's Day.

Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency chief executive Muriel Bamblett said it depicted Aboriginal people as "not knowing about their children and not having any role in raising their children".

"You feel quite oppressed when these things happen, I think that we everyday have to battle with direct racism and indirect racism," she told 774 ABC Melbourne.

"In the media, I think they have a public responsibility. That's obviously one of the opportunities to get good messaging about Aboriginal people.

"But if you're constantly stereotyping us as second class then it's about profiling us as second-class citizens in our own country."

Ms Bamblett said she would speak with outgoing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Mick Gooda about the cartoon.

"I'm going to ring Mick Gooda later today ... and talk to him about how we can actually take some action to stop this kind of constant attack on Aboriginal people because most Australians would not condone that," she said.'attack'-on-aboriginal-people,-indigenous-leader-says/7689248



Bill Leak is an idiot working for the idiots at the Murdoch idiotic rabid denialist media. One cannot expect anything intelligent from Bill Leak. No even the heavy blow he suffered to his head a few years ago can be blamed for his indulgence in crap... Do I feel outrage that a fellow cartoonist would produce such shoddy bias work designed to kick people when they're down? No, I feel sadness that someone who I hoped was "intelligent" is going the Nazy way. Bill Leak is an idiot.

So is Warren... In these times when one in 15 adult aboriginal person spend the night in WA prison, we must realise there is something wrong going on. And this did not happen before the white INVASION. Time to think BETTER rather than destroy hope in the rotten manner that Bleak Leek is doing. He is an idiot.

Did I say that Bill Leak was an Idiot?


Read from top...


bill leak apologises for being an unrepentant idiot...


After widespread condemnation on social media, Leak has hit back, describing his critics as "sanctimonious Tweety Birds having a tantrum".

He has drawn a second version of the cartoon, showing himself being handed by a black policeman to a man wearing a Twitter T-shirt and carrying a club and a noose.

Leak has defended his work and claims he is speaking the truth about violence and abuse in Indigenous communities.

In a statement, The Australian said: "Bill Leak's confronting and insightful cartoons force people to examine the core issues in a way that sometimes reporting and analysis can fail to do."


adding to the misery...

And yes we all subscribe to twitter (I don't) wear glasses (I don't) and wear black leftie beards (I don't)... And I don't carry a noose, nor a club. I am for the non-violent hanging of cartoonists of the right wing (CONservative side). And you can see the image of Bill Leak by Bill leak is accurate. Looks like someone who doesn't understand anything much, with an long lasting army crew cut. Read above and from top.


under fire from advertisers over Bill Leak’s cartoon...

The Australian has come under fire from advertisers over Bill Leak’s Indigenous cartoon with one major bank cancelling its advertising.

SunCorp Bank said on Twitter it “definitely [does] not support the cartoon in yesterday’s issue”.

“We are now working with our media placement agencies to remove our advertising from this content.”

the nazi turd-eaters versus the lemon-suckers...

Satire has its degrees. In my book, "CONservative satirists" are not satirists. They are sarcastic turd-eaters. They attack the little guy. They figuratively kill the down-trodden and side with the big guys — those with the big guns, tonnes of cash, boots and all — and laugh AT you, not with you. They trod on the flowerbeds of the poor with contempt. They are somewhat sadistic with the sad moral that if you don't like it, go and suck on lemons... I will oblige. This is the low life of Bill Leak who, in his turdy wisdom straight from his own arse, published a really mediocre interview with P J O'Rourke in "The Australian" under the pissy neon-like heading "PJ and me against the lemon suckers". Like Leak, P J O'Rourke is also a CONservative "funny" turd-muncher (though he knew better in his idealistic youth, then he saw where the cash came from) — a liberal gonzo Yankee who for the first time in his life is going to vote Democrat. Hillary is as far right as a rich deceptive Democrat can get without being mistaken for a full-blown neocon, while Trump is the no-where mad man destroying the Republican toy box.

Bill Leak tells us "Humorists have a duty to resist the taboos of political correctness"... he knows people with bookshelves that groan under the weight of turgid tomes about climate alarmism... etc. See, Bill Leak is a climate denialist, anti-femme, pro-nazi humorist. He loves Tony Abbott... He's not sure about lazy Turdball. His cartoon of Turdball is that of the "Emperor with no clothes". We've been there.

Sad waste of space those two nazi joke-farters are... 

leak adds salt to the wounds...

The assertion that Bill Leak and his editors make is already widely understood. There’s nothing exceptionally astute or extraordinarily perceptive about it. By now the Australian public is broadly aware that Aboriginal communities are severely impacted by issues that contribute to high incarceration rates, and more specifically the high incarceration rates of Indigenous children, particularly in the Northern Territory.

The problem with Leak’s cartoon is that it stalls, either wittingly or otherwise, well before the important conversation begins. It fails to broach in any meaningful or even clever way, the systematic, root causes of the over-representation of First Nations people in the criminal justice system. With Leak and his supporters, as is the case with successive federal and state governments, it is as though the 339 recommendations of the 1991 royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody simply do not exist.

Read from top.



india solar...

The single largest solar park in the world, with a maximum capacity of 1,000 megawatts, is nearing completion in India. The nine-square-mile Kurnal Ultra Mega Solar Park, which has cost 70 billion rupees ($1.09 billion) of both public and private money to construct, contains 4 million solar modules.

The park is located in the Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh state, which in recent years has distinguished itself as the solar power capital of India. It is a joint endeavor of India's Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) and the Andhra Pradesh Solar Power Corporation, a private venture company mostly owned by government corporations.

Construction of the park began in December 2016, and it is expected to be fully operational in May. Already, 900 of the park's 1,000 MW capacity has been implemented. Kurnal Ultra has single-handedly made Andhra Pradesh the Indian state with the highest solar power capacity, 1,867 MW. In second place is Rajasthan with 1,812 MW.

read more:

See stupid cartoon by Bill leak at top...