Friday 20th of September 2019



The mystery is how this woman without qualities, with all her incapacities, infelicities and ineptitudes, ever came to hold the highest office. Or why she wanted it. No one made her do it, greatness was not thrust upon her; indeed, it’s said she planned for it all her life.



So feel no pity that she chose to take on the impossible Brexit task with a vipers’ nest of a parliament and a party at war with itself. Her unsuitability was well known. Every encounter with others is an excruciating display of gaucheness. No small talk, no big talk, no ideas, no charm, no warmth, but famous for making everyone she meets painfully ill-at-ease. Her polite and courteous EU counterparts were dumbfounded by her inability at the essentials of diplomacy. She never had it in her to be the healer the country desperately needed. Instead she chose to appease the ERG, and sacrifice the 48% - now grown to be the majority.



read more:

the weird and not wonderful...

The weird world of post-Brexit vote UK politics swirls around some more. Now, in order to try to force her deal through the commons, May has pledged to resign as Prime Minister.

The field is set for a Tory leadership contest – the field for which is as narrow as it is unpromising. Boris Johnson is national joke, and sign that Britons will so far as to actually vote ironically. Michael Gove is a slimy lunatic, so right-wing that Ken Clarke and Liam Fox “raise their eyebrows”. Sajid Javid is as forgettable as he is unpopular. Amber Heard was found in contempt of Parliament less than a year ago.

In the final analysis we will have a Prime Minister the people didn’t chose, leading a parliament with no majority to force through a deal that’s already lost a commons vote. Twice.

British “democracy” is becoming a joke.


Read more:


And Tony Blair was a liar and should be in prison...

eight proposals of post-nups for the divorce...

The UK Parliament has failed to endorse an alternative plan on Brexit after Prime Minister Theresa May offered to stand down from the top job if her deal was delivered.

Key points:
  • MPs had eight options to vote on, including revoking Article 50
  • The votes were done privately
  • The strongest support was for a second referendum


Eight separate alternatives on the UK's withdrawal from the European Union were rejected by MPs in the House of Commons.

Politicians voted on options that included leaving the European Union without a deal, staying in the bloc's customs union and single market, putting any EU divorce deal to a public referendum, and cancelling Brexit if the prospect of a no-deal departure got close.

Any of the options that gained the support of more than half of MPs would have been debated next Monday as an alternative to Mrs May's deal, which has been rejected twice.


Read more:


Read from top.

yet another plan...

Brexit: MPs unlikely to pass withdrawal agreement in vote tomorrow - as it happened

Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including reaction to the latest Commons Brexit votes and to Theresa May’s announcement that she will quit before next stage of negotiations with EU

yet another defeat...

A component of British Prime Minister Theresa May's deal for leaving the European Union has been rejected a third time, defeated in Parliament 286 to 344 — a majority of 58 — during a vote held on Britain's so-called "Independence Day".

Key points:
  • The UK is on track to leave the EU on April 12 without a deal
  • European leaders will meet on April 10 for an emergency summit
  • Pro-Brexit supporters have gathered in London for "Independence Day"


The European Council moved quickly to confirm it unanimously refused to re-open talks, meaning the United Kingdom is now on track to leave the EU on April 12 without a deal.

"I think it should be a matter of profound regret to every member of this House that once again we have been unable to support leaving the European Union in an orderly fashion," Mrs May said in response to the vote.

"The implications of the House's decision are grave."


Read more:



Read from top.



It's possible that "this was the game plan all the time":... Get the UK out of Europe without a deal, giving the UK more freedom to act like an empire again — a tattered one, but free... to become the second fiddle of the American hegemony — and without having to pay compensation to Europe.

a diagram full of S-bends at the NYT...

Explaining Brexit in a simple graph (see the New York Times):


This man is trying to make sense of Brexit, one flowchart at a time. He would like to stop now.



the latest S-bend: half-pregnant...

Under the Common Market 2.0 proposal, the UK would leave the EU, but retain freedom of movement and make contributions to the EU budget.


Read more:



still pushing shit uphill or downhill, who knows...

Lino began by all but ruling out a no-deal Brexit. Though leaving the back door open just a smidgeon to one. She was fed up with bashing her head against the DUP and the Spartans of the European Research Group, so now she was going to try her luck with Jeremy Corbyn. Having kicked the can down the road for months on end in a desperate effort to keep her party together, she was now kicking it firmly into the Labour leader’s face. There was one question Jezza had to ask himself: “Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?”

What she hadn’t said was what compromises she was prepared to make. Mainly because she simply didn’t have a clue. You don’t get to resolve a lifetime of indecision in one cathartic, blinding moment of clarity. A Maybot is, as a Maybot does. The only real conclusion her near-obsolete binary brain had reached was that Brexit was a complete mess and, if at all possible, she didn’t want to go down in history as the prime minister who had deliberately chosen to tip the UK into recession and civil unrest.

Mostly she was just fed up, though. If the entire country was stressed out by Brexit, how did they think she was feeling? Just imagine what it must be like to be the person in charge who didn’t have a clue. She had felt so alone. Especially with a cabinet full of idiots. So it was time to let someone else have a go. And why not Corbyn? He’d been going on enough about how he had all the answers, so let him put up or shut up.


Read more:



Read from top.

the end of the end...

Wales Minister Nigel Adams resigns over UK PM’s promise to hold Brexit talks with Jeremy Corbyn

A Tory cabinet minister has become the first to quit over Theresa May’s move to reach out to the main opposition party and hold talks with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to find a solution to the Brexit crisis.


Read more:

may-hem to come?...


Phillip Lee was on his way to parliament last week when a man suddenly appeared in front of him. He was apparently furious and seemed to be screaming, but Lee had his headphones in: He was listening to one of his favorite songs, Stevie Wonder's "He's Misstra Know-It-All." It was only after he removed his earbuds that he realized he was being called a traitor. Nothing out of the ordinary, really. Indeed, Lee has almost grown used to it.

These days, he gets emails nearly every day calling him an turncoat and a disgrace to the country. People are demanding that he leave the party that he has been a part of for 27 years, and their furious passion has led him to install panic buttons in his London apartment to call for help in case of an emergency. His crime? Pushing for a soft Brexit. That has been enough to turn Phillip Lee, 48, who represents Bracknell in parliament for the Conservative Party, into a target. "It's a fucking nightmare," he says.

And it's far from being over. 

Brexit, which was originally supposed to take place on Friday of last week, has gone into overtime. As things currently stand, it's unclear if the extra period will last weeks, months or even years. But the longer the political war of attrition surrounding the United Kingdom's departure from the European Union continues, the more divided the country and its institutions will become. 

That's especially true of the Conservative Party of Theresa May, who is, at least for now, still the prime minister.

It was a small group of Conservatives, blinded by nationalism, that brought on the referendum in the first place. It is that same group that has also ensured that every attempt to bring Brexit to a conclusion -- any conclusion, really -- has failed miserably. Yet it was only on Tuesday evening, almost three years after the referendum, that Theresa May made her first desperate attempt to free herself from the hardliners by offering to meet with Labour to find a joint way out of the chaos.

It could very well be that May will be able to pull her country back from the brink at the very last second. But for her party, it may already be too late.

The Tories, long one of the best-oiled political machines in Europe, are on their way to total collapse. William Hague, a leader of the party, has warned that the situation is far worse now even than it was following the devastating election defeat against Tony Blair in 1997. "The ruin I moved into as the new leader was, at least, intact," he has said.

The irony is difficult to miss. Ever since the tenure of Margaret Thatcher, Tory prime ministers have sought to assuage the party's anti-EU voices by taking on many of their demands. But 30 years later, the Conservatives are more divided than ever. And Theresa May, who took the job after the brutal Brexit battle of 2016, has only made that gap wider.

It was May who -- following the narrow referendum result -- steered her country towards a hard Brexit, despite that being only one possible interpretation of the vote. In her first big speech, she announced the country would exit the common market, leave behind the customs union and throw out the many (EU) immigrants who were allegedly abusing the country's social services.

Then, this woman -- who has a weakness for pithy grandiloquence -- backed herself into a rhetorical corner: "No deal is better than a bad deal," she famously said.

In doing so, she emboldened both hardliners within her party and all nationalist Brits to not give up an inch to the EU during negotiations. It was the first shot fired in an unprecedented smear campaign against any Conservative who dared to push for a compromise between London and Brussels. The yellow press branded them "traitors" and "mutineers."

A Party Re-Defined

One of the first to be confronted with unfiltered hatred was Anna Soubry, formerly the minister of state for small business. For a time, just walking into parliament for her was akin to running the gauntlet. She was -- rather paradoxically -- branded a "Nazi" by protesters and began receiving death threats. Her crime? She tried to work together with Labour MPs to find a Brexit solution that could gain majority approval. By late February, Soubry had had enough: Together with two other Tory women, she left the Conservative party and joined an independent group of former Labour lawmakers. 

The three ex-Tories wrote a letter to May in which they argued: "Brexit has re-defined the Conservative Party -- undoing all the efforts to modernize it." Now the rebels want to register as a new party called "Change UK."

These events clearly demonstrate that the battle over Brexit has the potential to change the British party landscape for the long term. Rarely have so many lawmakers been willing to turn their backs on their parties in such a short period of time. And never have the two major parties had to tolerate so much resistance and lack of party solidarity. Because of Brexit, the collapse of the de facto two-party system has now become a realistic outcome. 

The Conservatives experienced another painful loss this week, when one of the party's best-connected MPs, the maverick Nick Boles, announced he was leaving the party. Boles claims that May only ever tried to save her own party, and never put forward a responsible plan that would serve the entire country. That, he said, would have consequences. The Tories -- a party that "did not really exist anymore," he said -- could expect several years in the opposition.

And if moderate Conservatives refused leave on their own accord, they would be forced out. Months ago, fervent EU opponents launched a campaign to strip Tories willing to compromise of their parliamentary mandates. "Deselect The Tory Traitors. The Time Is Now," the Leave.EU website reads. The man behind the purported grassroots initiative is the controversial businessman Arron Banks, who supposedly donated close to 8 million pounds ($10.5 million) to the pro-Brexit campaign -- the biggest political donation in British history. To this day, it remains unclear where the money came from. A British parliamentary investigation found numerous connections to banks in Russia, but no conclusive proof of external influence. Banks himself denies any such influence occurred.

Banks never stopped pushing for a hard break between the UK and the EU. He's now using a tactic known among political scientists as "entryism," a method favored historically by Trotskyists keen on taking over parties of the workers' movement. In the British version, it works like this: Convinced Brexiteers should acquire Tory membership in targeted constituencies that are represented by EU-friendly MPs in British parliament. Once the balance of power in the local Tory branches have shifted, the new members are to organize a process to vote them out of power. Step-by-step instructions for such a move can be found on Banks' website.

Attempted Coup?

The rebels celebrated their first spectacular victory on Friday of last week in none other than Gerrards Cross at the foot of the tranquil Chiltern Hills. The constituency there has been represented for 22 years by Dominic Grieve, a conservative and old-school MP with a reputation, even among his political opponents, for being fair, friendly and guided by facts. During a raucous meeting at the local Crowne Plaza Hotel, which Grieve himself described as "slightly rowdy," the 62-year-old was booed and called a "liar." His offense: He considers Brexit to be wrong and argues the British should have a say in the final agreement with the EU.

In the end, Grieve was forced into a vote of confidence, which he lost by a clear majority. The vote was initiated by a man who had run against him for the right-wing UKIP party just two years ago. An astonished Grieve reported that around 100 people "I had certainly never seen" had showed up to the meeting. His fate as an MP now hangs by a thread.

Dozens of other level-headed conservatives could soon be confronted with similar maneuvers. It is likely no coincidence that the number of Conservative party members is increasing in electoral districts represented by EU-friendly MPs. Phillip Lee, too, reports the Tories in Bracknell have seen their ranks swell by 25 percent in the past nine months, and said, "I suspect that a majority of these people has the strong desire to get rid of me."

The well-organized EU opponents hope to have recruited 25,000 Brits for the Tories by January. This would be a dramatic development for an aging party that until only recently had been steadily shrinking and currently has just over 120,000 members.

What has long since been the norm in London has expanded into the electoral districts. Party colleagues mercilessly wage war against one another, goaded by whispers, the source and interests of which cannot be individually identified. In the Tory party, which for centuries has tamped down internal conflicts in its pursuit of power, things have been turned upside-down. There is no leader in sight who could unify the quarreling mob.

Tory historian Tim Bale, a professor at Queen Mary University of London, speaks of the "worst crisis in the history of the Conservative Party." The last time such a hopeless situation occurred, he says, was back in the 1920s, when the party fought bitterly over free trade. This time, however, the crisis is "both acute and chronic," Bale argues -- and with Theresa May, the party is headed by a leader in name only. 

It's doubtful whether May's final Hail Mary attempt will get the situation under control. This week, immediately following May's announcement that she would seek a Brexit solution with Jeremy Corbyn, many conservatives mounted rhetorical onslaughts against her, with hardliners about the fact that she had reached out to Corbyn, of all people -- a man they have for years mocked as a socialist, terrorist apologist, anti-Semitic good-for-nothing. Brexit purists like Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg warned of Marxist influences. One group of up to 30 EU-haters that calls itself the "Spartans" -- and has been described by moderates as "suicide bombers" -- discussed whether it was time for the nuclear option: to overthrow May's government with the help of the opposition.

The situation is so muddled that it hardly seems possible for a Brexit proposal with majority support to be found by next Wednesday, when EU leaders are scheduled to meet again. If no proposal can be agreed upon, May will have no choice but to apply for a very long postponement of her country's exit from the EU -- though she requested a shorter delay until June 30 on Friday. It seems unlikely, though, that EU leaders will grant that wish, and one possible outcome is a much longer delay, which would force her country to take part in EU elections one last time. It's an outcome that May would like to avoid at all costs.

Uncharacteristic Anger

On Friday of last week in London, it became clear why May has reason to fear EU elections. The day was originally meant to be the day Britain left the EU, and thousands of people flocked to the parliament building to express their anger at the "House of Clowns."

The dual-rally marked a closing of ranks between a Brexit campaign and the now far-right extremist UKIP party, which won the last EU elections with an astonishing 27 percent. Crowds in the usually courteous UK are rarely this angry, with protesters holding up signs claiming that democracy was dead because Brexit had not yet come to pass. Meanwhile, prominent EU-haters, including one Tory MP, unloaded their frustration onstage.

The crowd zealously greeted Nigel Farage, the former Brexit front man who once signaled his intention to retire from politics but is still very much around. Should the British once again have to vote in the EU elections, Farage has said he would lead the newly founded "Brexit Party," an offshoot of UKIP.

The demonstration was taking place on "enemy territory," Farage said, and maligned those who sat behind the walls of Westminster Palace as traitors. "Let me tell you, I will fight them!" he promised, while a few isolated shots of "Rule Britannia!" could be heard emanating from the crowd.

It was the unofficial prelude to an election campaign the likes of which Britain may never have seen. Things could get dirty, noisy and scurrilous. And it's not hard to guess which party will be the first to fall victim to the mayhem.


read more:



See also:



Read from top.

may in june 1922...

UK Prime Minister Theresa May will outline her departure proposal at a meeting with Graham Brady, the head of the 1922 Committee, the Conservative Party group in the UK House of Commons that oversees the party’s leadership, The Financial Times reported Thursday.

May presented her new version of the withdrawal deal earlier this week. The prime minister argued that if the parliamentarians backed her plan, they would be able to vote on a confirmatory Brexit referendum. May's move prompted criticism among lawmakers and officials. Moreover, the House of Commons leader Andrea Leadsom has stepped down over disagreements with May while the opposition called for a snap general election and some parliamentarians urged May to resign.



Read more:



Read from top.


Brexit bludgeon batters Britain’s politics all over again -
George Galloway
Desperate spin notwithstanding, the tsunami created by Nigel Farage’s six-week old Brexit Party may sweep away centuries-old parties which may now begin to split into their constituent parts.

But first a word about Farage. As a populist politician he is perfectly evolved. Cheerful, possessed of only the ordinary vices, personable, a communicator of genius. He is neither a philosopher nor an ideologue but gripped by one iron-clad obsession – British withdrawal from the European Union.

Single-mindedly pursued for a quarter of a century, this obsession has changed the course of history in a way not matched since Mr Churchill in the summer of 1940, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair not excepted

I have privately criticized him for prematurely departing the stage when Brexit was won after the 2016 referendum – but in fact his timing has been perfect. He gave the ruling elites, conspiring to wreck Brexit and defy the voters, just enough rope. And now they have hanged themselves.

The Duke of Wellington was still telling his Battle of Waterloo war stories in the British Parliament when the Tory Party was last this kind of void in British politics and that was only because they hadn’t then been formed. In getting on for 200 years the Tories have largely lorded over us and this week they polled in single digits. The departure of Theresa May has triggered a scramble of candidates for her job but it is bald men fighting over a comb.

READ MORE: Anti-establishment parties scored big in EU elections since bloc became ‘problem & not solution’

The Labour Party as we know (and some of us loved) it, is dead. The coalition of Blair-Labour and Corbyn-Labour, of Remain members depending on Leave voters, of right-wing wreckers and liberals masquerading as leftists, identity-politics freaks and shop-stewards peace campaigners and blood-soaked warmongers, that Labour Party is dead.

Jeremy Corbyn’s 70th birthday party was surely spoiled as the results emerged on the day. His sincere, often skillful, walk down the middle of the road had ended as such walks always do – in his being hit by the traffic going both ways. I have known Corbyn for nigh 40 years and for decades had a close personal and political relationship with him. I have been his most stalwart defender on a daily basis in the British media for four long years – I could show you my scars. And so it pains me to say that this is the end of the line for him.

When his effectively number-two-man Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell – like so many an erstwhile Trotskyist – joined the betrayal of democracy cause in a tweet, the morning after the results, the writing was on the wall for Corbyn. McDonnell joined up with Labour’s disloyal deputy leader Tom Watson, leadership hopeful Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry, and Shadow Brexit Secretary Sir Keir Starmer QC, to demand an immediate volte-face by Corbyn in full unequivocal support for a new referendum. With Labour campaigning for remaining in the EU he signed Corbyn’s political death warrant.


Read more:



Read from top.


German Chancellor Angela Merkel has suggested an alternative to the Irish border backstop - a key Brexit sticking point - could be found within 30 days.

Speaking at a news conference alongside Prime Minister Boris Johnson in Berlin, she stressed it would be up to the UK to offer a workable plan. 

The PM said he was "more than happy" with that "blistering timetable".

He accepted the "onus" was on the UK, but said he believed there was "ample scope" for a new deal to be reached. 

In his first overseas visit to a fellow leader, Mr Johnson is meeting Mrs Merkel after he told the EU the backstop - which aims to prevent a hard Irish border after Brexit - must be ditched if a no-deal exit was to be avoided. 

He will meet French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday, before attending the G7 summit on Saturday alongside other leaders including US President Donald Trump.

The EU has repeatedly said the withdrawal deal negotiated by former PM Theresa May, which includes the backstop, cannot be renegotiated. 

And - despite Mrs Merkel's comments - that message was echoed by Mr Macron on Wednesday evening.

"Renegotiation of the terms currently proposed by the British is not an option that exists, and that has always been made clear by [EU] President Tusk," he told reporters in Paris.


Read more:


Still the same shit seen from a different outlook. The ball is back in Borisexit-court but he will blame Europe if he fails to come up with the same plan that the Europeans can only accept. Should they go for less pain on Britain, the European would poke themselves in the eyes with an escargot skewer... Boris can only hope his silly bluster will make them doodoo this...


Read from top.


See also: