Wednesday 22nd of May 2024

white house improvements...

peace prizola

Since World War II, the US has maintained a strategic alliance with the Saudi kingdom and asked few questions about its internal or external affairs. In exchange, Washington gets access to cheap petroleum and huge airfields. However, the genocidal war in Yemen is unprecedented and popular opinion has shifted firmly against Riyadh.


by 

The White House has paused two proposed sales to Saudi Arabia of $760 million in guided munitions after moving to end US support for Riyadh’s six-year-long war in Yemen.

According to Defense News, the two sales are a $290 million foreign military sale of 3,000 GBU-39 Stormbreaker “small diameter bombs” built by Boeing, and the other is a $478 million direct sale from Raytheon of 7,000 Paveway IV smart bombs. Both weapons are deployed by aircraft for precision strikes like those the Saudi Royal Air Force has conducted against Yemeni Houthi forces since 2015.

“We are ending all American support for offensive operations in the war in Yemen, including relevant arms sales,” Biden said in a Thursday speech. “At the same time, Saudi Arabia faces missile attacks, UAV strikes, and other threats from Iranian-supplied forces in multiple countries. We’re going to continue to support and help Saudi Arabia defend its sovereignty and its territorial integrity and its people."

In other words, weapons sales to the Arab monarchy aren’t cancelled or banned. However, it’s unclear who Biden is referring to as carrying out attacks against Saudi forces. A White House spokesperson told Defense News that US support for offensive operations against Daesh and Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula would continue - indeed, the US’ undeclared war in Yemen long predates the Saudi-led conflict.

The Saudi war began in 2015 when the Houthis, a Zaidi Shiite sect from northern Yemen, led mass protests over reforms widely believed to amplify poverty in one of the world’s poorest nations. The Houthis forced Yemeni President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi from power and Hadi fled to Riyadh, which launched a coalition war to restore Hadi to power in Yemen that included the US, United Arab Emirates, Morocco, and Sudan, among other Sunni-majority nations.

The Saudi-led bombing campaign has destroyed much of the country’s infrastructure, including schools and hospitals, and a naval blockade has all but prevented medical and food aid from reaching the country, exposing millions to hunger and disease. More than 100,000 Yemenis are believed to have been killed. However, the Houthis seem to have turned the tide and mounted increasingly daring and penetrating attacks into Saudi Arabia, including ballistic missile and suicide drone strikes against the petroleum industry, which is the foundation of the Saudi monarchy’s wealth.

In the final days of the Trump administration, the US State Department designated the Houthis as a terrorist organization, which the department under Biden is now reviewing. The US has accused the Houthis of being regional puppets of Iran, but evidence Tehran is actually arming the group is slim at best.

A White House spokesperson told Defense News that proposed weapons sales to Saudi Arabia would return to the oversight process that former US President Donald Trump sidestepped in order to circumvent congressional objections.

On Friday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki further noted the administration would “expect Saudi Arabia to improve its record on human rights,” including releasing political prisoners. The Biden administration is also expected to soon declassify a dossier on the 2018 murder of Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was slain by a Saudi hit squad in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. 

The CIA under Trump seemed poised to point the finger at Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, the power behind the Saudi throne, but Trump demurred, not wishing to alienate an important ally while his administration was turning the screws on Iran. A separate probe by the Saudi monarchy blamed rogue elements in the administration while exonerating the crown prince from any wrongdoing.

While Biden is much more critical of the monarchy than Trump was, he is still keen on cooperating with Riyadh, including trying to bring them into negotiations with Iran on a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - a move Tehran has repeatedly rejected.

US support for Saudi Arabia extends back to World War II, when US President Harry Truman sent a top secret cable to King Abdulaziz ibn al-Saud pledging that "One of the basic policies of [the] United States in [the] Near East is unqualifiedly to support [the] territorial integrity and political independence of Saudi Arabia."

“In the 75 years of this peculiar alliance between the United States and Saudi Arabia, the two countries have had many deeply serious, profound differences, over many subjects," historian Thomas Lippmann told Sputnik in 2019.

"The United States has never - not once - put this relationship on the line over the fate, or the human rights of, any individual or group of individuals. In fact, the Truman administration put a policy in writing that said exactly the opposite. It said: ‘We're there to do business and for reasons of security. We're not there to tell them how to run their country or organize their society.' That policy's never been rescinded, and that's what we have always done."

 

Read more:

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/202102051081993971-white-house-pauses-smart-bomb-sale-to-saudi-arabia-but-leaves-room-for-future-weapons-aid/

 

both presidents offered support...

The cartoon at top from Ted Rall/Sputnik

 

Under the Obama and Trump administrations, the US served as firm supporters of the Saudi-led conflict in Yemen, with both presidents offering support in the form of weapons, transportation and intelligence logistics, among other means. Even when the Trump White House faced congressional opposition on the matter, US support never wavered.

 

 

US President Joe Biden announced on Thursday the US would no longer provide offensive support in the Saudi-led war in Yemen, a move highlighting a somewhat clear pathway toward distinguishing his administration from those of his predecessors.

However, it’s unclear just how much distance the current administration will be putting between itself and those of former US President Barack Obama and Donald Trump when one takes into consideration the individuals filling out Biden’s cabinet positions.

In fact, while Biden attempts to wash himself of the US involvement in the Yemen conflict, Avril Haines’ appointment as the director of national intelligence is likely to serve as a constant reminder. Under the Obama presidency, Haines played a central role in crafting the legal framework regarding the administration’s controversial drone program.

Incidentally, Haines’ track record also includes efforts to cover up the US’ infamous torture program, as she worked to redact much of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques.” The New York native also cleared a panel decision to not reprimand CIA personnel who spied on committee investigators.

 


Read more:

https://sputniknews.com/cartoons/202102041081983413-unshakeable-ghosts/

 

See also: 

a sociopathic woman, or just doing her job?

great speech, but...


Joe Biden calls on American leadership to confront Russian authoritarianism that he claims threatens American democracy. But every problem between the two has its roots in US actions Biden once supported. Physician, heal thyself.

“America is back. America is back. Diplomacy is back at the center of our foreign policy.”

With these resounding words as his starting point, President Joe Biden gave his first major foreign policy address, symbolically delivered at the State Department headquarters, with Secretary of State Anthony Blinken in attendance. His was a message of rebirth and hope.

“As I said, in my inaugural address,” Biden noted, “we will repair our alliances, engage with the world once again, not to meet yesterday’s challenges, but today’s, and tomorrow’s.”

Biden’s speech covered a wide range of topics, ranging from the Covid-19 pandemic to climate change, from the Middle East to LGTBQ rights. He waxed eloquently about the nexus between democracy and progress.

“Defending freedom, championing opportunity, upholding universal rights, respecting the rule of law and treating every person with dignity,” Biden said. “That’s the grounding wire of our global policy, our global power. That’s our inexhaustible source of strength. That’s America’s abiding advantage.”

But in Biden’s world, the road toward America’s re-emergence as the global “shining city on a hill” that inspires all who gaze upon it is strewn with obstacles put in place by those nations who oppose Biden’s midwifing of American exceptionalism. Newton’s Third Law of Physics, where every action has an equal and opposite reaction, applies to geopolitics as well as science. This means that American “democracy” will be opposed by the forces of “authoritarianism.” 

To confront this, Biden notes, “American leadership must meet this new moment of advancing authoritarianism,” including “the determination of Russia to damage and disrupt our democracy.”

Biden reiterated the points he made to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their phone call of January 26, where, as he “made it clear to President Putin in a manner very different from my predecessor, that the days of the United States rolling over in the face of Russia’s’ aggressive actions, interfering with our elections, cyber-attacks, poisoning its citizens are over.”

Biden’s shopping list of alleged Russian sins is an interesting one, given that none of the three delineated actions has been substantiated as fact. Chris Krebs, who headed up the US Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Agency, publicly declared that “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.” This comment wasn’t made lightly, Krebs noted, but rather was derived from “three and a half years of gaming out every possible scenario for how a foreign actor could interfere with an election.”

While a joint statement from the FBI, NSA, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and Office of the Director of National Intelligence has declared that the Solar Winds cyberattack can be attributed to “an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actor, likely Russian in origin,” major cyber security companies, such as FireEye, who first detected the Solar Winds intrusion, were more circumspect.

“We are not attributing to a sponsor at this time,”Benjamin Reed, FireEye’s director of threat intelligence, said. “We don’t have sufficient evidence to support naming a specific sponsor.”

Biden’s reference to “poisoning its citizens” is an odd observation to make when defining threats to American democracy, given that it most likely refers to the allegations that the Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny was poisoned by Russian security officers using the deadly chemical agent Novichok. Unless Biden is postulating constructive connectivity between the US and Russian political opposition (none exists), such linkage is nonsensical.

Moreover, the allegations of poisoning have not been substantiated by anything remotely resembling fact. Indeed, Russia has been refused access to the laboratory results underpinning the claims that Navalny was poisoned. Rather than serving to illustrate an example of a Russian attack on US democracy, as alleged by Biden, the Navalny affair better illustrates the opposite — the ongoing attack on Russian democracy by the United States.

The reality is that the future of US-Russian diplomatic interaction will not be defined by false claims regarding Russian election interference, unsubstantiated allegations regarding the Solar Winds cyberattack, or the Russian domestic drama surrounding Alexei Navalny. Rather, the US-Russian dance card will be filled trying to resolve current “hot topics” such as Syria and Libya, Ukraine and the Baltics, and the role played by nuclear weapons in defining the nature and degree of conflict that can be expected in any practical application of Biden’s new anti-rolling-over doctrine.

Whose aggression?

The problem facing Biden, and to a large extent his Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, is that the world situation as it exists today regarding US-Russian diplomatic friction is not defined by any US accession to Russian aggression (i.e. “rolling over”), but by Russian reaction to US-led aggression. Here, the geopolitical corollary of Newton’s Third Law applies in full effect.

It was the US-led NATO intervention in Libya in 2011 to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi that has led to the current level of chaos and unrest there. Russia’s involvement is merely the logical extension of a nation defending its national interest in light of the unpredictability brought on by the resulting power vacuum.

Likewise, the Russian intervention in Syria in 2015 only happened after the US conducted a covert war against Syrian President Bashar Assad that began in 2011. Cause and effect analysis clearly places responsibility for the originating actions that led to the conflict in both Libya and Syria on the United States, and in particular the administration of Barack Obama, where both Blinken and Biden served.

Likewise, any analysis of the current crisis in Ukraine, and the resulting expansion of tensions between Russia and NATO in eastern Europe, shows that the initiating point was not reached as a result of Russia’s intervention in Crimea, but rather as part and parcel of the US-led expansion NATO eastward. It was a US-orchestrated coup in Ukraine in early 2014 that triggered Russia’s actions regarding Crimea. Again, these policies occurred during the Obama administration, at a time when Joe Biden was heading up its Ukraine policy.

While Biden touts the success of the extension of the New START treaty in order to safeguard nuclear stability by preserving the last remaining treaty between the US and Russia, the fact is that the arms race that is being held in check by the extension of New START has as its roots the American commitment to a global missile defense system that Russia, rightly so, believes exists for the purpose of targeting Russian missiles.

While the current stand-off regarding missile defense dates back to the decision by the administration of George W. Bush in 2001 to withdraw from the landmark 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty, that action has been exacerbated by the deceitful manipulation by the Obama-Biden administration of Russian domestic politics, where Obama held out the promise of “flexibility” on the issue of missile defense to then-President Dimitry Medvedev. But Obama’s promise was not only contingent upon his winning re-election, but also on Medvedev staying on as Russia’s president. Putin’s return to office in 2012 ended Obama’s pretense of flexibility. The result is a Russian buildup of its strategic nuclear capability designed to overcome US missile defense.

History is a demanding mistress, and it will be interesting to see how Biden overcomes the uncomfortable reality that the present conflicts he accuses his predecessor of “rolling over” for in the face of Russian aggression are really problems of his own making.

When it comes to diagnosing the disease that is undermining American democracy at home, and by extension American authority abroad, Biden would do well to look in the mirror and put into action the Biblical proverb contained in Luke 4:23: Medice, cura te ipsum – “Physician, heal thyself.”

 

Read more:

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/514781-biden-russian-aggression-roll-over/

 

 

Read from top.

 

Biden speech is worth ZERO, as long as Julian Assange remains in prison. Not only this, this fact and this speech highlight the hypocrisity of the USA.

moving portraits and biting dogs at the WH...

...

 

Given the recent escapades of other White House pets, however, chances are the cat will go the way of the “immediate $2,000 checks” and other Biden promises. 

During the campaign, Democrats shamelessly pandered to the Americans’ love of animals, with Biden promising he would restore dogs to the White House and pointing to his rescued German Shepherds. The first pups spawned many a cringe-worthy pun during the past two months, but now they’re in the doghouse after one of them was involved in a “biting incident.” 

A dog bed was seen propped up on the external wall of the White House on Tuesday, as Psaki told reporters that the 3-year-old Major was “surprised by an unfamiliar person and reacted in a way that resulted in a minor injury to the individual.”


Major and his 13-year-old companion Champ were thus deported from Washington to the Bidens’ estate in Delaware. Psaki says the move is temporary, of course. Either way, the dogs’ departure is a setback both for the Biden image and for the media, who fawned over the pets in an effort to contrast him with Trump. The 45th president famously didn’t have any and even said once that it “felt a little phony” to get a dog for political clout.

Deprived of the four-legged gambit, the press then shifted gears to art, pointing out that the Biden administration has “restored” the official portraits of the 42nd and 43rd presidents to their traditional spots, after they were moved “to a less prominent location” last year. Truly “relentless” media coverage there.

 

The White House has restored the official portraits of former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton to a traditional display spot after they were moved to a less prominent location last year, a Biden administration official said. https://t.co/g4XLuZnO5e

— The New York Times (nytimes) March 9, 2021

 

 

Then again, it could be subliminal propaganda; Trump had routed both the Clinton and Bush political dynasties on his way to the presidency in 2016, and “restoring” their portraits fits the narrative of the Biden presidency being a restoration of the Obama “normalcy” upset by the uncouth usurper. 

On Monday, Biden struggled with the name and title of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin – who was literally standing right behind him – during a speech promoting female generals, and described him as “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” To precisely no one’s surprise, the incident was laundered by having “Tim Apple” trend on Twitter, referring to the time Trump had addressed Apple CEO Tim Cook that way.

This is what the media, both new and traditional, choose to do rather than wonder why the fully vaccinated Biden is still going around wearing two masks, or why he hasn’t scheduled an address to Congress that’s been traditional since the 1970s. Are “norms” irrelevant all of a sudden? The White House isn’t even using the coronavirus as an excuse, it’s simply offering none – and that’s just fine in Our Democracy, nothing to see, move along.

 

 

Read more:

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/517665-biden-cat-dogs-distractions/

 

 

Read from top.