Friday 10th of February 2012

SPACE-TIME POLITICS

 

Space shuttle Discovery is due to dock with the ISS... [2005]
while snails are returning to Earth at great speed... on a Soyuz spacecraft carrying Russia’s Salizhan Sharipov, US astronaut Leroy Chiao, and Italy’s Robert Vittori...
Strange... I thought (or was it in a dream?) a few days ago about studying snails, but in space? Hey, why not and see which way they curl up or get their foot in a knot while frothing at the mouth...?
This brings me to another one of chapters in modern human history that are very important to me...
These events represent the underlying way we, the general public, live happy as Larry under our beautiful skies, while we have no clue what is happening deep in the corridors of powers, or up there in the battles of space wars, with umbrellas of threats and counterthreats, of deep analysis of these threats and these counter threats, of governmental desires of supremacy and controls...
History provides the trends on which we are moving towards... but we need to know what is on the table... as well as what’s hidden under it.
Humanity on earth is like the magic colours of a soap bubble but like it... it is so fragile...
Unfortunately, we “vote” and live in democracies that cannot afford too many people asking the right questions... or know too much...

THE VAN ALLEN BELTS
I’d like thus to not so much expose, as it is somewhat known, but I’d like to remind those who know and tell those who don’t know, especially our young people about a sorry series of events that happened during the 50s and 60s... and still have massive repercussion today. See in many areas of governmental development, planning often starts 30 years before any headway is achieved in the desired direction. Thus R&D (Research and Development) burns an enormous amount of dollar before bringing returns and all this money comes from our pocket or our kids’ future earning, that we’re spending NOW...
I am referring here to the Van Allen Belts saga... and the nuclear age and tests that followed from that first explosion in the Nevada desert.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are well known, the French atomic tests in Tahiti are well known, the English tests in this country are also well studied but some tests never made it to the front page of the rags of the day.
Even on that first Nevada test, the father of the “bomb”, Robert Oppenheimer was slightly worried the chain reaction would not stop once the nuclear fuel was “spent”although he was 99 per cent sure it would... The calculations proved right otherwise the earth would have become an extra “sun” in our solar system...
A friend of mine asked me about Aurora Borealis a few days ago and I nearly cried... I remembered these many misdemeanours we were doing (and those we are still doing) to our little planet...

What are the Van Allen Belts indeed?
In simple broad terms, it’s a conglomeration of charged particles at about 1000 km above the earth surface (lower in some parts) that are trapped by the earth magnetism and stirred up by solar winds which they deflect... A division occurs between night and day... and since the belts do not exist in the polar regions we get the fantastic glow of the upper layers of the atmosphere being exposed directly to solar winds...
The Van Allen Belts also act as a reflector of radio waves for certain frequencies, mostly in the short band width. It’s not “designed” as such but it’s a very useful natural property and many “Ham” radio operator would know that it works best, if only, during night time...
In the wisdom and madness of the space age race and nuclear supremacy, the USA and the USSR did nuclear tests up there, in mid last century just “to see what would happen...” . In fact it was part of impact studies a nuclear explosion would have on not yet-developed satellites, in the future... as well as other secret agenda, like domination in  space...

Summary notes from the US tests follow thus (similar tests and results from the USSR):
_________________
from astronautix.com
Family: Status USAF X-17
Country: USA.
Sounding Rockets flight test program at Cape Canaveral studied reentry problems by
simulating reentry velocities and conditions with a three-stage solid-fuel Lockheed X-17.
A total of 26 X-17 flights were conducted until March 1957.
1958 Aug 27 -Launch Site USS Norton Sound Launch Complex

Argus 1
The Argus series were the only clandestine nuclear ever conducted by the United States.The rocket-launched nuclear warheads were set off at very high altitudes over the South Atlantic,1800 km south-west of Capetown,South Africa. The purpose was to determine the effects of nuclear tests explosions on the Earth’s
magnetic field and the impact to military radar, communications, satellites and ballistic missiles electronics. The earth’s magnetic field is not only off-axis from the earth,but also off centre from the earth’s core. This means the Van Allen Radiation belts are closest to the earth in the region known as the ‘South Atlantic Anomaly’.
This made the selected launch point the ideal place for launching a rocket into the lower belt where the particles and radiation from the explosion would be trapped.

Van Allen Radiation belts
The 1.7 kiloton W-25 warhead used had been developed and previously tested for the Genie air-to-air missile.The first test was launched from 38.5 deg S,11.5 deg.W, and exploded at an altitude of 160 km. The initial flash was followed by an auroral luminescence extending upward and downward along the magnetic lines where the burst occurred.The experiment verified the predictions made in the original October 1957 proposal by N.C.Christofilos of the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory in Livermore*.

1958 Aug 30 — Launch Site USS Norton Sound Launch Complex — Argus 2
Second covert Argus launch to study effect of nuclear explosions on the Van Allen radiation belts
The launch location was 49.5 deg South, 8.2 deg West; altitude reached 294 km; yield of the nuclear warhead, 1.7 kilotons.

1958 Sep 6 — Launch Site USS Norton Sound Launch Complex — Argus 3
Third and final covert Argus launch to study effect of nuclear explosions on the Van
Allen radiation belts. The launch location was 48.5 deg South,9.7 deg West ;altitude
reached 750 km; yield of the nuclear warhead,1.7 kilotons.
1959 - Deputy Secretary of Defense Quarles announced that three blasts were secretly
fired in space (Project Argus) in 1958, using modified X-17 rockets.

_______________________
Gus: I can say here that although there was “minimal” damage to the Belts, one cannot but measure the long term effect of such explosions... The US repeated similar series of tests in 1962... The Russians also conducted similar tests...

The following article from the:
“© British Crown Copyright 2004/MoD. Published with the permission of the controller
of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office”
could be bogus but I don’t think so... here it is anyway...
____________________________
Modelling Artificial Van Allen Radiation Belts
Computational Physics Group, Design Physics Department, AWE Aldermaston, Reading,
Berkshire,
RG7 4PR.
Atmospheric detonation of nuclear weapons leaves many nuclides (the weapon debris) in states which decay by emission of -particles and -rays in the MeV energy range. These radionuclides typically decay along a chain of daughter species over a considerable period of time, and so the -particles and -rays are classed as “delayed” radiation.
Delayed radiation resulting from a nuclear burst in the upper atmosphere can pose a serious threat to space-based systems, especially satellites.
Unprotected satellites may be damaged by the impact of energetic -rays, for example, or by the accumulation of charge due to sweeping up both -particles and the electrons that they produce in atmospheric ionisation events.
Modern electronic components can be particularly sensitive, but may be “hardened” in critical systems if deemed necessary. Determination of the -particle flux produced by high altitude detonations is therefore important to satellite design.
A particular problem is the long term persistence of the flux due to charged particle trapping by the geomagnetic field producing artificial radiation belts.
AWE has established a model for calculating the hostile environments presented by geomagnetically
trapped -particles following a high altitude nuclear burst.
In order to build a model of nuclear-induced radiation belts, kinetic theory is used to find the characteristics of the bounce motion back and forth along the field lines and the Eastward (and curvature) drift motion which the
-[negative] particles undergo.
A model for the atmospheric detrapping of -particles is also required. Non-collisional particle diffusion mechanisms can destabilise radiation belt particles in the long term; the experimental results from high altitude nuclear tests in the 1950s and 1960s cannot be reproduced unless non-collisional effects, such as interactions with electromagnetic waves, are assumed either to move the s across field lines (“L-shells”) or to alter the
altitude at which the particles reflect.
A model, “AIRTIGHT” (Artificially Injected Radiation Trapped In the Geo-H-field Toolkit), has been developed to track motion in reflection point altitude, longitude, energy and L-shell phase space using a simple dipole approximation to the geomagnetic field.

A Monte Carlo approach* is taken, where non-interacting particles are generated from realistic debris distributions. The flux is calculated from these data by use of the analytically determined bounce periods of the particles. Determination of the altitude of the mirror point for each particle becomes an issue, and the atmospheric effect on the pitch angle of the particles has been included. Some sample output from the AIRTIGHT model will be presented, and some broad conclusions on satellite vulnerability drawn.
© British Crown Copyright 2004/MoD. Published with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

_________________
This third article extracted from a feasibility study of the international Space Treaty till 2015...
_________________________
...... HAND* [ High Altitude Nuclear Detonations] can destroy or disrupt LEO [Low Earth Orbit] satellites in two primary ways. First, prompt X-rays can upset or burnout the electronics for the five to ten percent of each LEO constellation within line of sight of the explosion.

212 Second, in weeks to months, potentially all non-hardened LEO satellites can fail due to the cumulative effects of phenomena such as transient-radiation effects on electronics (TREE) and system generated electromagnetic pulse (SGEMP) as the satellites operate in the greatly increased radiation belts the explosions
cause in LEO orbits.

213 One of the largest problems, however, in assessing the specific level of threat posed by HAND is a lack of experimental data on the effects of HAND on satellites (especially on modern satellite systems) and this contributes to a range of assessments concerning the severity of the threat.

214 The United States conducted two high-altitude nuclear test series before such testing was banned by the LTBT; the tests were conducted in August and September of 1958 and again during the Summer and Fall of 1962.

215 The ARGUS series was designed to test and did confirm the theory of Nicholas Christofilos of the University of California’s Radiation Laboratory that the high-energy electrons produced in a high-altitude explosion would become trapped in the Earth’s magnetic field.

216 As predicted, these trapped particles do “pump” up the radiation belts through which LEO satellites [Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellites] pass during each orbit and slowly build a potentially fatal radiation dose for the satellite’s electronics. The good news is that satellites can be hardened against nuclear effects including TREE and SGEMP. According to the HALEOS* study: “sufficient hardening to survive HAND [High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND)] a very short-term-induced total radiation dose could add 2-3 percent to satellite costs beyond what is required to harden against the natural environment.”

217 What are the best technical and political options for the United States to mitigate the risks associated with HAND? Watts is surely correct is his assessment that “for the next 15-20 years, the most sensible stratagem for
preventing an exo-atmospheric nuclear detonation is a combination of deterrence and
hardening the satellites themselves.”

218 These two best options are emphasized below. However, as with the other most difficult security challenges such as counterproliferation or the other most challenging space cases discussed below, a comprehensive, layered, and synergistic approach to this threat would seem to offer the best prospects for success. For these cases, the United States should pursue a range of policies designed to move up the escalatory ladder from denial, to reassurance and dissuasion, cooperative and involuntary reversal, deterrence, passive and active defenses, through counterforce operations including preemptive strikes.

219 For HAND more specifically, the United States should begin by continuing its arms control efforts such as the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) designed to deny potential adversaries the tools necessary to carry out a HAND.
---------------------------------
Back to Gus:
We can see here in item 217-218-219 a complex game of deceit and manipulation in order to control space. In some way we could not agree more at limiting the risks of the nuclear threat but that gives an enormous power to one country alone if we follow the US model alone...
When the article mentions electronics of satellites being at risks because of radiation one has to read as well, and this is firmly stated in Encyclopedia Britannica, that astronauts and cosmonauts are at risk as well at certain distance from earth (in the vicinity of 1000 km... although the decay in space of the -particles and the -radiation was noted to be particularly fast for nuclear decay (scattering ).
Yet it can be said using information from other sources that from these tests that the radio-activity in the Van Allen Belts is about a thousand fold what it was prior to the tests. May be we should worry too much... may be we...

This leads me also to another article recently published in the Sydney Morning Herald:
rediscovering the global nuclear threat... Since the early 60s me and my friends have been on the barricades tooting this problem loud and clear...
Yes, the massive nuclear arsenals of the world are not just idle decorations in someone’s backyard like a bunch of smiling garden gnomes. The weapons are aimed. They are ready to be armed within seconds. They are pointed at someone else... There is a plethora of red buttons...
Nuclear Disarmament was (and I believe still is) a great priority (if not his first) of P J Keating when he was Prime Minister. The first (or second? can someone out there refresh my memory on this chronology...?) lecture of Professor Keating (after he had been voted out of office) at the University of NSW was on this very subject and he painted a bleak picture that could not be anything else but bleak...
All this, despite a “disarmament” treaty being in force... The dismantlement of some of the arsenal does not preclude the secret and even not so secret invention of new ones...
The US are working on the “Son of Star Wars” to which Australia has been committed by J W Howard, the US are developing smaller targetable nuclear device that have “minimal” environmental damage... Neutron bombs are also here and, at the very bottom of this sorry nuclear pile of hardware, we have the depleted uranium shells, used in Gulf War One, in Kosovo and Gulf War Two (more can be said on this subject alone). These shells cannot be classified as Nuclear Devices although they do emit low radio-activity to about 300 times acceptable levels if one is close enough, and much higher once they “vapourise”. They can be and should be classified as primitive “dirty” nuclear bombs...

LINE OF SIGHT
The huge arsenal of the US would be aimed someone... say at China, Russia and a few smaller countries for good measure... The huge Russian arsenal would be pointed at China and the USA, while China’s would point at the other two, principally. The Indian nuclear arsenal is focused on Pakistan while the Pakistani outfit is aimed at India... The Israeli nuclear arsenal would have several direction around that small country, and target Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Iraq, Iran and a few others. The French arsenal like the English arsenal would be targeted at everybody else...

This seemingly arrested status quo is always in a flux especially when things (like monitoring) can go wrong. A few too many times Russia was on red alert, so were the Yanks... This also is difficult to monitor as a lot of these arsenals are stashed away on nuclear submarines, cruising the world oceans 24-7 (to use this ugly Yankee euphemism meaning 24 hours a day seven days a week...)
Who can forget the missile crisis in the early 1960s. In this saga the tooted hero was President Kennedy... but the real winner was President Kruschev, as he got the US to remove the nuclear devices pointed at Russia from a bit too close in the Turkish region... The most recent known incident in 2005 was when a US memo was badly written and a spelling mistake started a huge nuclear scare... Brother!

LOST IN SMOKE
So we’re marooned between one minute-to-midnight and one second-to-midnight from near-total oblivion on the surface of this planet, at any moment in time.... All we need is an idiot... I hate to be a prophet of gloom and doom but unless we come to our sense urgently and stop to democratically elect waring idiots in charge of our communities we should be able to pull things back a bit and see ourselves grow old... This is why the UN is so important despite its short-comings... It should be encourage to flourish and become a true centre for people of good will... This is why someone like John Bolton should not be contemplated as the US ambassador to the UN.

Hey, it’s quite funny as I was watching the ABC the other night about songs and protests... Here we had a young man fighting the obviously undemocratic behaviour of governments, yet these days these undemocratic behaviour are worse yet we don’t even hear “boo” from the youths we’re stuffing up the future of...  But due to massive deception, our governments hide their undemocratic behaviour, with the help of a media designed to put us to sleep with illusions and dreams of a better diet program... The generation-me (selfish) is winning the day... The be positive is a great seller... It’s like as if it’s un-Australian to bag J W Howard... it’s like as who cares... It’s Hollywood... Ironically, Payback and True Lies.... in the Mel Gibson movie, Payback, Kris Kristofferson plays the worst of baddies while in real life he is at the vanguard of protecting democracy... in the movie True Lies Arnold Swatzernegger plays a savior spy while in real life he adopts pseudo-nazi policies...

ECONOMY?
Yes I could not agree more with John Howard that trade is best to minimise tension between countries and he is not the owner nor the creator of this concept... it’s as old as 40,000 years of aboriginal traditions... The major problem presenting itself in our present situation with “increase trade” is also the increasing expenditure of energy to produce more stuff thus speeding up the global warming...
It’s a catch 22 situation...

What other cock-ups are we planning for the earth beside blowing up bombs in the Van Allen Belts? The accelerated deforestation of the Amazon? Dumping waste in the world oceans? Keep an eye out for the person who has nothing to lose, like the fanatic who profess god-given rights and for the grubby greedy monster who could not care less... keep a watch for the politicians who make promises and then say sorry for breaking them... (J W Howard). The only way out all this is to become more frugal. No other short term practice can help... The Flower people, the hippies of the sixties might prove to be right after all...
But will it be too late?

By Gus Leonisky at 25 Apr 2005 - 11:24am

reinstated on 21 July 2009 - 10:45

War Without End

Read excerpts from Andrew J. Bacevich's new book The New American Militarism, How Americans Are Seduced by War over at TomDispatch.

US at War

I had not seen that one yet but there are other references and writings on that subject. The “war push" with the US started before the civil war with the war against Mexico and the US has been more or less at war ever since - the US-Mexican War (1846-1848), US Civil War 1861-1865, Spanish-American War of 1898 and so on and on. The list is long from Nicaragua to China. I have the full list somehwere.

But here is an interesting viewpoint from Russia:

Izvestia
No. 28
February 2003
[translation from RIA Novosti for personal use only]
21ST CENTURY AND PREVENTIVE WARS
By Fedor BURLATSKY, chairman of the Scientific Council on Political Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Basically this letter explains after commenting on the oil in Iraq, that "preventive wars of the USA have yet another specific feature — Messianism. The Americans are convinced of their designation: to bring the ideals of democracy to the peoples of the world. Democracy and freedom are really absolute values for every person..."
But that, "A preventive war is a dangerous weapon. This is why a certain code of international-legal terms is needed, which, however, is not confined to UN resolutions only." And so on.

Yes T. G.! New nuclear posture indeed!

Extract from the article mentioned:
___________________________________

"""""US nuke policy rethink prompts physicist protest
Boffins against the bomb
By Lucy Sherriff
Published Wednesday 26th October 2005 15:58 GMT

Almost 500 physicists in the US have signed a petition protesting a proposed change in government policy that would allow the US to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries. The proposed change in policy was reported in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

The petition's instigators, both professors of physics at The University of California, San Diego, said that they felt an obligation to take a stand because of the role physics played in developing the weapons in the first place.

The change in policy would undermine the long-standing nuclear non-proliferation treaty, professors Jorge Hirsch and Kim Griest argue in the petition.

They write:

The underlying principle of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is that in exchange for other countries forgoing the development of nuclear weapons, the nuclear weapon states will pursue nuclear disarmament. Instead, this new U.S. policy conveys a clear message to the 182 non-nuclear weapon states that the United States is moving strongly away from disarmament, and is in fact prepared to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear adversaries.

etc etc"""""
_________________________________

As alluded in my blog above this one, I have extrapolated that, although it's not overt US policy to point nukes at non-nukes countries, in practice this has been the case for years. To ratify this status as an official government policy is only the surface of an iceberg of deceit and secret plans that have been formulated for yonks. We know that in a case of conflicts all options — from napalm to unranium deplete bullets, and the nuke option — are part of the six-shot revolver pack....

lost in space...

Weird indeed... as the news of a Chinese stupid experiment, blowing up an "old" satellite into a million pieces of space junk from a rocket (that does not impress future astronaut and cosmonaut who could be hit for six by the debris, while floating above our beautiful planet) I was was going to tag along this news from China with my potted history of "space war" since the 1950s in the blog at the top "SPACE-TIME POLITICS"...

But I noticed with dismay that, either when YD moved furniture, some legs fell out or a boffin at Spooks Inc. decided the info was too hot to let it stay on the net and cracked the code to edit the piece by removing the controversial bits and leaving the heading and intro so no one would notice... But then the Chinese blow up came along. I will have to dig in my archives of filed bits to retrieve the full article that was dealing with the early nuclear experiments made by the US and the USSR in space...

Star Wars Three- Revenge of the Pentagonians

I can visualise a whole lot of Pentagonians dusting off the Reaganite plans and modernising them as we speak. No doubt the concepts of Star Wars I have had a few spring cleanings over the years, awaiting such situations as the Chinese demonstration.

These days however, it would be just as easy, as Andy Thomas was saying last year, to sling a few easy-launch lightweight drones into the sky to duke it out as requiredl Pretty useful rooks. The bishops will be the missile shield ships, able to concentrate firepower on any terra-based target in the Asia Pacific.

The space race never stopped. Watch how important Woomera becomes in the next twently years

Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan

Just over sixty years ago, the Soviet Union became the second country to possess nuclear arms when it tested its first nuclear bomb near Semipalatinsk in the then-Soviet republic of Kazakhstan.

An exhibition at the State Archive, which runs until Sunday, is devoted to the anniversary of the Soviet bomb and showcases a fascinating collection of previously classified materials related to its construction.

“We are glad to show everyone these priceless historical documents. For a long time they were hidden from the public, but we managed to gain access to them. Our ultimate aim is to tell the truth about the first Soviet nuclear bomb,” said Sergei Mironenko, the State Archive’s director.

-----------------------

read the top comment under the image...

water on the moon...

The recent discovery of water on the Moon by India's inaugural lunar mission almost never happened because of a twin helping of good old-fashioned red tape and lingering Cold War suspicions, reports science writer Pallava Bagla.

Hidden behind the euphoria of the find is a less publicised tale of complex back room dealings between Indian and Americanspace science teams.

Back in 2004, scientists from the two countries were eager to collaborate, but the Bureau of Export Control in the US did not share this enthusiasm. In fact it was seen by some on the Indian side as being singularly obstinate.

It is accused of not being willing to clear the paperwork that would allow sophisticated American-made instruments to be airlifted to Bangalore for the mission.

------------

read blog at top of this line of comments...

van allen belts

from the First Post

In 1962, the United States blew up a hydrogen bomb in space. The video above, posted by NPR, shows the results.

Why did they do it? Just four years earlier, a scientist called James Van Allen had discovered belts of high-energy particles around the Earth that were held in place by the planet’s magnetic field. Today those belts are called Van Allen belts.

The space nuke was big news in Hawaii Exploding an H-Bomb in space

Van Allen soon got involved with a US military plan to send rockets hundreds of miles into space to see what would happen if they were detonated in these Van Allen belts. The atomic bombs, which were first sent up in 1958, had little effect, but in July 1962, they tried a hydrogen bomb.

The operation, codenamed Starfish Prime, was so successful it created artificial extensions of the Van Allen belts that could be [seen?] from New Zealand to Hawaii.

The only thing more insane than the idea of trying to blow something up that you’ve just discovered is the reaction of the general populace, who seem to have lapped up the chance to see the resulting “nuclear rainbow”.

--------------------

see article written by Gus in 2005 at top...

star wars show of strength...

THE United States threatened to take military action against China during a secret ''star wars'' arms race within the past few years, leaked documents show.

The two nuclear superpowers shot down their own satellites using missiles in separate shows of strength, the files suggest.

The US government was so incensed by Chinese actions in space that it warned Beijing it would face military action if it did not desist. However, the Chinese carried out further tests as recently as last year, leading to protests from the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

Beijing justified its actions by accusing the Americans of developing an ''offensive'' laser weapon system that would be capable of destroying missiles before they left enemy territory.

The disclosures are contained in documents obtained by the WikiLeaks website.

The standoff began in January 2007 when China shocked the White House by shooting down one of its own weather satellites 850 kilometres above the Earth.

The strike, which resulted in thousands of pieces of debris orbiting the Earth, raised fears that the Chinese had the power to cause chaos by destroying US military and civilian satellites.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/america-threatened-china-over-star-wars-20110203-1affj.html

Read 2005 article at top... and this earlier warning on this caper...

the "saturnian" rings of earth...

The amount of junk in space is rising exponentially, with continuous collisions between abandoned equipment, spent rockets and other debris creating ever growing clouds of dangerous fragments, an influential report warned on Thursday.

The report, commissioned by Nasa, says the quantity of hazardous material circling the Earth has reached a "tipping point" and poses a real and increasing danger to satellites and the International Space Station.

It suggests developing a clean-up strategy, which could include catching debris with nets, magnets or giant umbrellas.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/01/space-junk-rising-exponentially-earth

 

read article at top...

the better rocket...

On Thursday, two satellites will launch from French Guiana to begin the process of rolling out Galileo - Europe's multi-billion-euro version of the American Global Positioning System (GPS).

If that were not significant enough, the spacecraft will ride to orbit on the first Russian Soyuz rocket to operate from Western territory.

I'll talk more of Galileo later in the week, but I want to concentrate on Soyuz for this posting.

Formally initiated by European space ministers in 2003, the new Soyuz launch complex has been constructed at Europe's spaceport - the Guiana Space Centre (CSG - Centre Spatial Guyanais).

It is inside the Sinnamary commune about 15km up the coast from the Kourou commune where the pad was built for Europe's heavy-lift workhorse, the Ariane 5 rocket.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15335656

 

Anyone who has studied rocket science would know by now that the Russian Soyuz rockets have been the best workhorse of space exploration... The most efficient rockets using the most efficient hot fuel combination...

read article at top...