Navigation
Search
Recent Comments
Democracy Links
Member's Off-site Blogs
Uncle George... and the JFK conspiracies...
The assassination of President John Kennedy was the result of a major conspiracy. The information about it has been side-tracked, confused and masterly hidden.
More than 40,000 pages of “information”, transcript of interviews and court cases have recently been released. Some of these have been redacted — that is to say that critical information has been removed from public view. There are still many pages to be released but these are not on the public record. Why not?
To tell it simply, somewhere in all these pages, there is strong evidence of a conspiracy, which would run contrary to the official narrative that Oswald — the loony designated murderer — acted alone. He did not. Behind his action, if he was culpable and not just a fall guy for “being there with a gun”, there was a whole world of intrigue and double-crosses, with counter-crosses and many crisscrosses.
The beginning of the 1960s was eventful for the USA with the Cuban revolution, the “Cold War” with the USSR — and some countries being reluctantly shaped to the will of the USA, like Indonesia, The Philippines and Japan.
Meanwhile it appears that — possibly in order to avoid WW3 — President Kennedy, after his altercation with the USSR in regard to the “Cuban missile stand-off, was about to make peace with the said country. By then the agreement with Krutchev, was that the USA would remove their nukes from Europe and the USSR would remove its rockets from Cuba — and the world would be better for it. It has to be said that the USSR had placed nuclear missiles in Cuba AFTER the USA had installed nukes in Europe.
As well, after the disastrous Bay of Pig failure, Kennedy might have been prepared to make a reasonable deal with Castro. Meanwhile Europe, through Adenauer and especially General de Gaulle was a bit recalcitrant in regard to the US hegemony. Europe was preparing to become united under its own steam. De Gaulle was fighting his own terrorists, some of them could have been inspired by the CIA…
Despite his popularity, Kennedy would have annoyed the budding neocons in the USA, because of all this. He would have annoyed the Cuban refugees — some very high in the previous Cuban government. The USA were gaining peace, but in this process, the USA were losing influence.
In his 2018 State of the Union speech, Donald Trump repeatedly referenced a specific gang, MS-13, by name. These mentions were intended to justify his administration’s anti-immigration policies. Though MS-13 originated among Salvadoran immigrant communities in L.A., most of its members are now concentrated in Central America, particularly El Salvador. The group is relatively small: Of the 1.4 million gang members the FBI estimates are in the U.S., less than one per cent of them belong to MS-13.
To most Americans, it makes sense that the federal government targets large organizations that commits crimes nationally. But before Robert F. Kennedy’s term as Attorney General from 1961 to 1963, the federal government — as well as most Americans — didn’t seem to understand the concept of “organized crime.”
When Kennedy arrived at the Department of Justice, its organized crime and racketeering section “was just two or three lawyers reading files,” says Ronald Goldfarb, a lawyer who worked in the section under Kennedy and wrote a book about the subject titled Perfect Villains, Imperfect Heroes. “[Kennedy] enlivened it so that it quickly grew to about 60 lawyers, and it was the department’s priority.”
Under Kennedy, one of the DOJ’s main focuses became the Mafia, which by the mid-20th century had an estimated 5,000 members and thousands more associates across the country. Previously, individual gang members had been investigated for crimes, but this was the first time the government had attempted to take this organized criminal organization on the whole.
The department also investigated crooked unions, gambling rings, and other organizations that broke laws in multiple parts of the country. In 1961, Kennedy sent Goldfarb and others to Newport, Kentucky, with instructions to look into a lurid case. When a man named George Ratterman ran for sheriff of Newport’s county of Campbell on a platform of tackling the city’s rampant crime, his opponents drugged him and planted him in bed with a stripper named April Flowers to discredit him.
Known as “Sin City”, Newport was then a hub for prostitution and the center of a national gambling ring, where a betting syndicate handled “over the wires, extraordinary sums of money bet around the country,” Goldfarb writes in his book. In the end, Ratterman won the sheriff’s seat and crime began to go down.
Kennedy also had to push past the resistance from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who at the time spoke and behaved as if he didn’t believe the Mafia existed. “It’s not clear” if Hoover really believed that; but in any case, Goldfarb says Hoover had “other reasons” for avoiding organized crime.
When Franklin Roosevelt became president in 1933, Hoover worked hard to develop a close working relationship with the president. Roosevelt helped promote Hoover’s crime control program and expand FBI authority. Hoover grew the FBI from a small, relatively limited agency into a large and influential one. He then provided the president with information on his critics, and even some foreign intelligence, all while ingratiating himself with FDR to retain his job.
President Harry Truman didn’t like Hoover much, and thought Hoover’s FBI was a potential “citizen spy system.”
Hoover thought President Dwight Eisenhower was an ideological ally with an interest in expanding FBI surveillance. This led to increased FBI use of illegal microphones and wiretaps.
The president looked the other way as the FBI carried out some questionable investigations.
Thus, apart from being “agents for peace”, both Kennedys, John and Robert, would have pissed off the Mafia, as well.
As well, Kennedy’s brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy ordered an army general, Ted Walker, committed to a mental asylum for a 90-day evaluation in response to his role in the Ole Miss riot of 1962, where Walker showed his full-on racist side. Walker’s psychiatrist, Thomas Szasz, protested and Walker was released within five days. Attorney Robert Morris convinced a Mississippi grand jury not to indict Walker.
On April 10, 1963, Walker became the target of an assassination attempt in his home, but escaped serious injury when a bullet fired from outside hit a window frame and fragmented. After the investigation into the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the Warren Commission concluded that Walker's shooter had been Lee Harvey Oswald.
There are some troubling extra information about the Walker assassination attempt. This is where we meet Uncle George. No, this is not about George W H Bush (yet), but about one of his acquaintances. George de Mohrenschildt (Jerzy Sergius von Mohrenschildt), a Russian-born petroleum engineer whose story as so far detailed in the long-kept secret JFK assassination files and recently released, reads like a spy novel. That's one reason why de Mohrenschildt, who died in 1977, has been a staple of Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories for almost 54 years.
George W H Bush knew de Mohrenschildt. De Mohrenschildt was “a mate of a mate” that Bush met a few times. De Mohrenschildt knew Oswald. Jacqueline Kennedy, as a young Jacqueline Bouvier, knew de Mohrenschildt. It was her who referred to de Mohrenschildt as “Uncle George”, as when a little girl, she often sat on his knees.
At one stage, when de Mohrenschildt (check?) visited Oswald at his home, he saw Oswald’s gun and asked Oswald if this was the gun he had used to try to shoot General Walker with…
Thus, did Oswald really try to shoot Walker and did someone knew about this BEFORE the assassination of John Kennedy?...
As well, as the CIA was being composted from the restructuring of the OSS, many CIA operations were designed to infiltrate many religious organisations such as the Quakers and other “peaceful organisations” to check out and influence on their connections with the USSR and prevent them from spreading the message of “peace”.
The CIA, of which George W H Bush was an active spy for since he was 18 years old, would have been pissed off by the Kennedy brothers, for trying to “make peace” as well.
Oswald was on the radar of the CIA and the FBI for having gone to Russia and for having married a Russian woman, with whom he had a kid. At this stage it is highly possible that Oswald had an FBI or CIA controller. As his movements were closely monitored, how did he “manage to shoot JFK”... The lynch-pin amongst all this crap was de Mohrenschildt who was of mixed Polish, Russian, Ukrainian backgrounds but was also considered by the CIA to be a Nazi agent, still after the end of WW2.
Ukraine had for a while been a supporter of Nazi Germany, until the Red Army came through Ukraine, “liberating” Ukraine — but as we have seen recently, there are still many Nazis in Ukraine — a situation that did not escape the Obama administration.
So, to recap, John Kennedy had made some powerful enemies:
— The Mafia
— The anti-communist Russians
— The Cuban refugees
— The CIA
— The army brass protective of general Walker.
— The Nazis
— J. Edgar Hoover (fiercely Republican) FBI Director from 1924 to 1972 (48 years!).
— Crooked unions
— gambling rings
— The Neocons.
Who could make the links between all these and “help them” eliminate John Kennedy?
First, though Oswald was officially DEEMED to be the shooter in General Walker’s attempted assassination — only AFTER THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK, we do not have his motives for his try to eliminate General Walker. Oswald had to have been coached by someone in order to do the deed. Otherwise, why would Oswald try to kill Walker out of his own bat? The assassination of John Kennedy could strongly hinge on this conjecture.
Meanwhile, George W H Bush was cutting his teeth at the CIA, under the watchful eye of the then boss:
To:
Director
Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Department of State
[We have been] advised that the Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized raid against Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy might herald a change in U.S. policy… [Our] sources know of no [such] plans… The substance of the foregoing information was orally furnished to Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency and Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Remember that Uncle George (Jerzy Sergius von Mohrenschildt) was into petroleum and that George W H Bush made his fortune in petroleum as well — an industry where George W H Bush recruited many CIA agents....
Gus Leonisky
More to come
- By Gus Leonisky at 12 Jan 2019 - 5:36pm
- Gus Leonisky's blog
- Login or register to post comments
jacqueline...
George Michael Evica was born in Cleveland, Ohio, on 8th December, 1927. He studied at the Case Western Reserve University (1945-49) and Columbia University (1951-55).
He taught at the Rutgers University (1956-57), Columbia University (1957), Wagner College (1957-59), Brooklyn College (1957-1960), San Francisco State (1960-1964) and the University of Hartford (1964-1992).
Subjects taught included Myth and Ritual in Literature, Genre Studies in Literature, Literary Criticism, Consciousness Development and the Symbolic Process, Linguistics, Film Studies, Creative Writing, Investigative Reporting, and Investigative History. He also published papers on John F. Kennedy, Fidel Castro and Jimmy Hoffa. He also studied Advanced Studies in Linguistics and Anthropology at Columbia University (1957-1960) and Advanced Studies in Myth and Literature at Hartford Seminary Foundation (1971-73).
In 1977 George Michael Evica provided evidence to the House Select Committee on Assassinations. He also wrote extensively about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This included, And We Are All Mortal: New Evidence And Analysis In The Assassination Of John F. Kennedy (1978). It was described by Mary Ferrell as the "best documented" of the books on the assassination.
Evica organized the First National Conference on the JFK Assassination in October, 1975, at the University of Hartford and was director of the Connecticut Citizens Commission of Inquiry (1975-76). He published twelve major articles and presented twenty-two major papers at conferences on the assassination in the United States and Europe.
Evica also produced a weekly half-hour radio program which initially focused on the JFK assassination and related matters, and later covered a wide range of political topics from a so-called "radical" perspective. “Assassination Journal,” which was broadcast by the University of Hartford’s radio station WWUH from 1975 to 2007, continually expanded its investigative scope to include coups, murders, and mysteries such as TWA 800, the Gulf War Syndrome, and the failed war on drugs.
Ed McKeon, who also presented a show on the WWUH radio station, praised the work done by Evica: "I think it's very easy to go along your merry way in life and not have skepticism for what's presented to us, what's laid before us as the truth. I think that's the one thing I learned from him: You always ought to question authority, question what someone is trying to convince you is the truth. Truth is slippery, but for the good of ourselves, we need to pursue it."
Read more:
https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKevica.htm
Approximately one month out from perhaps the most fraudulent funeral in modern times it remains astounding how so many otherwise sensible people could lie so unabashedly about an individual so evil.
For make no mistake, George Herbert Walker Bush was one of the more despicable entities of the Twentieth Century. From the early days of his involvement with the CIA and its entanglement in the assassination of John Kennedy (Director Hoover was absolutely convinced Bush played a major role)
...to the "coincidence" Bush's brother Neil was to have a festive dinner with would-be Reagan assassin John Hinckley's very own brother Scott the night after the act (true story - look it up)
As compared to the makers of magnificent inventions, glorious artworks and the foundations of modern society - who all passed either alone, neglected or derided - there is the spectacle of George Herbert Walker Bush, a vile and odious man who has finally slinked off toward his loathsome dominion. That he was allowed to flourish and thrive and have a circus maximus of mourning says more of us than it does of him.
At any rate, the mendacities and fabrications concerning Bush are but fleeting things. No one of substance mourns. No person of consequence will long remember. No more breath need be spent on him.
For truly great men are in need of no fine words to praise them. Their eulogy is your love of their works and their legacy is the way in which you live your lives.
Guy Somerset writes from somewhere in America.
See more at http://www.pravdareport.com/opinion/columnists/11-01-2019/142170-0/
More to come.
Could you do something to remove the net around us?...
You will excuse this hand-written letter. Maybe you will be able to bring a solution to the hopeless situation I find myself in. My wife and I find ourselves surrounded by some vigilantes; our phone bugged; and we are being followed everywhere. Either FBI is involved in this or they do not want to accept my complaints. We are driven to insanity by the situation. I have been behaving like a damn fool ever since my daughter Nadya died from [cystic fibrosis] over three years ago. I tried to write, stupidly and unsuccessfully, about Lee H Oswald and must have angered a lot of people — I do not know. But to punish an elderly man like myself and my highly nervous and sick wife is really too much. Could you do something to remove the net around us? This will be my last request for help and I will not annoy you any more. Good luck in your important job. Thank you so much.[57][58]
George H. W. Bush responded:
Let me say first that I know it must have been difficult for you to seek my help in the situation outlined in your letter. I believe I can appreciate your state of mind in view of your daughter's tragic death a few years ago, and the current poor state of your wife's health. I was extremely sorry to hear of these circumstances. In your situation I can well imagine how the attentions you described in your letter affect both you and your wife. However, my staff has been unable to find any indication of interest in your activities on the part of Federal authorities in recent years. The flurry of interest that attended your testimony before the Warren Commission has long subsided. I can only speculate that you may have become "newsworthy" again in view of the renewed interest in the Kennedy assassination, and thus may be attracting the attention of people in the media. I hope this letter had been of some comfort to you, George, although I realize I am unable to answer your question completely.
— George Bush, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. [CIA Exec Reg. # 76,51571 9.28.76][c]
On November 9, 1976, Jeanne had Mohrenschildt committed to a mental institution in Texas for three months, and listed in a notarized affidavit four previous suicide attempts while he was in the Dallas area. In the affidavit she stated that Mohrenschildt suffered from depression, heard voices, saw visions, and believed that the CIA and the Jewish Mafia were persecuting him. He was released at the end of the year, however.
According to the Dutch journalist Willem Oltmans, in 1967 a "serious and famous Dutch clairvoyant" named Gerard Croiset had a vision of a conspirator who had manipulated Oswald;[59] his description led Oltmans to Mohrenschildt, and the two stayed in touch. In 1977, Oltmans went to Texas and brought Mohrenschildt to the Netherlands.[59] Oltmans claimed that he had rescued Mohrenschildt from a mental institution to bring him to the "famous" clairvoyant, Croiset. According to Oltmans, Croiset agreed that Mohrenschildt was the man he saw in his vision.
Oltmans says that after Mohrenschildt arrived in the Netherlands, he invited him out with some Russian friends. They went to Brussels and had plans to go to Liège, a city in the French-speaking part of Belgium. Oltmans owned a house in the countryside not far from Liège. Upon returning to Brussels, Mohrenschildt went for a short walk from which he failed to return. He had earlier agreed to meet Oltmans and his friends for lunch. Oltmans waited for him but he did not come back.[60]
Read more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_de_Mohrenschildt
Read from top.
A comedy of errors or a well-crafted conspiracy?
This is a double-cross play by Leonikaspeare.
List of main characters:
President John (Jack) Kennedy. Dead.
His wife, Jacqueline “They killed my husband”…
His “murderer” Lee Harvey Oswald who shot John Kennedy in the neck.
Lee Harvey Oswald’s murderer, Jack Ruby who shot one bullet while planning to shoot three.
The Secret Service personnel, recovering from a “night on the town”, on the fatal day.
Various doctors who did autopsy under duress and secrecy.
George Hickey, the Secret Service agent who "most likely" shot John Kennedy with the explosive bullet.
The explosive bullet.
The magic bullet.
Uncle George.
The plot
In 1963 many organizations wanted to get rid of President Kennedy and his brother Robert.
The Russians have been mentioned that after having been “humiliated” by Kennedy forcing the retreat of their nuke missile from Cuba could have done the deed. In fact, the deal was that Russia would pull out of Cuba AS LONG AS THE US REMOVED its own nukes from Europe and surroundings. The deal was 50/50, possibly a tad in favor of Russia, but 100 per cent in favor of non-confrontation. The media saw zip.
Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was a loose cannon with major psychological issues. One clever “handler” could manipulate LHO’s moods and desires of notoriety. His attempt at killing a right wing general, General Edwin Anderson Walker, was quite in line with LHO’s “leftist-communist” expressed views, but killing a democratic (considered of the left) President is very much on the borderline side in LHO’s scope of deed for “becoming famous”. Someone would have sowed the seeds in LHO’s mind. And was LHO really a communist or was he playing a double game? Was de Mohrenschildt his "handler? Note de Mohrenschildt had some "connection with the CIA, through G HW Bush and possibly higer up, though he was "not welcome" there for being a Nazi. Was missing killing the General PART OF THE PLAN?
Connection with Cuba: LHO was distributing leaflets to support the Cuban revolution but did not manage to reach Cuba (refused Visa). His love of Cuba could have been manipulated to make him hate President Kennedy who had muffed “the Bay of Pigs” invasion. Here it is possible to speculate that the invasion organized by the CIA was leaked at the highest level to the Castro regime.
Jack Ruby, is another loose cannon. He is a nightclub owner with a massive amount of debt. Connection with Cuba: he was disappointed with Cuba before the Castro revolution. Like LHO, he was somewhat emphatic about the Cuban revolution.
By then the US administration, possibly without approval from President Kennedy, tried over and over to retake Cuba and/or assassinate Castro (a bit less than 200 attempts)
Some friends of Jack Ruby said that jack did shoot LHO “for the money”. Ruby said murdering LHO was not premeditated. Evidence POINTS THE OTHER WAY. Ruby PLANNED to kill LHO. Ruby was condemned to death, but before his second trial where he promised to “tell all” went ahead he died in Prison from cancer in 1967.
The Secret Service people who were a sad bumbling lot on “that day”. They did everything that could go wrong go wrong.
The CIA meanwhile was bubbling along as the CIA does:
John Alex McCone
November 29, 1961–April 28, 1965
After the disaster of the Bay of Pigs Invasion, ( Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)-sponsored paramilitary group Brigade 2506 on 17 April 1961) President John F. Kennedy[6] forced the resignation of CIA director Allen Dulles and some of his staff. McCone replaced Dulles as DCI on November 29, 1961.[7]
McCone was not Kennedy's first choice; the President had tentatively offered the job to Clark Clifford, his personal lawyer, who politely refused (Clifford would later serve as Secretary of Defense for Lyndon Johnson); and then to Fowler Hamilton, a Wall Street lawyer with experience in government service during the Roosevelt and Truman administrations. Hamilton accepted, but when a problem developed at the Agency for International Development, he was shifted there.[9] Thus Kennedy, urged on by his brother Robert, turned to McCone.[9]
He was a key figure in the Executive Committee of the National Security Council (EXCOMM) during the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. In the Honeymoon telegram of September 20, 1962, he insisted that the CIA remain imaginative when it came to Soviet weapons policy towards Cuba, as a September 19 National Intelligence Estimate had concluded it unlikely that nuclear missiles would be placed on the island. The telegram was so named because McCone sent it while on his honeymoon in Paris, France, accompanied not only by his bride, Theiline McGee Pigott but by a CIA cipher team.[10]
McCone's suspicions of the inaccuracy of this assessment proved to be correct, as it was later found out the Soviet Union had followed up its conventional military buildup with the installation of MRBMs (Medium Range Ballistic Missiles) and IRBMs (Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles), sparking off the crisis in October when they were later spotted by CIA's Lockheed U-2 surveillance flights.
While McCone was DCI, the CIA was involved in many covert plots; according to Admiral Stansfield Turner (who himself later served as DCI from 1977 to 1981, under President Jimmy Carter), these included:[11]
In the Dominican Republic, the CIA had armed an assassination plot to take out President Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Molina. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy wanted the project stopped because it was too soon for another debacle. The problem is that once you encourage and arm a group of highly motivated locals, you can't just turn them off. Trujillo's enemies gunned him down dramatically, though technically speaking without U.S. help.
In Laos, the CIA backed the Hmong (then known by the derogatory name Meo) people of the highlands to fight a counterinsurgency. This set off a complicated three-way civil war that hit the Hmong hard.
In Ecuador, the CIA helped overthrow President José Velasco Ibarra. His replacement didn't last long before the CIA turned on him, looking for greater stability and allegiance.
In British Guiana, the CIA stirred up trouble through the labor unions to take down the democratically elected Cheddi Jagan.
In Cuba, there was Mongoose, a secret campaign against Castro.
We have already mentioned the other organizations that wanted to get rid of President Kennedy and his brother Robert:
— The Mafia
— The anti-communist Russians
— The Cuban refugees
— The CIA
— The army brass protective of general Walker.
— The Nazis
— J. Edgar Hoover (fiercely Republican) FBI Director from 1924 to 1972 (48 years!).
— Crooked unions
— gambling rings
— The Neocons.
Here we need to add the Secret Service… OR SOMEONE SENT TO THE SECRET SERVICE TO DO THE DEED.
Who could make the links between all these and “help” eliminate John Kennedy?
THE POSSIBLE KILLER: George Hickey.
After their night on town, ALL the Secret Service agents were worse for wear — except Hickey who had not joined them... They had drunk all night, “played with girls” and by 5.00 AM had to rally for their 8.00 AM briefing. Some agents of various “sections” had quarrelled and some of the most experienced ones were “left behind”. One at the airport and the other one, at one stage, was strangely relegated to the last car of the “Presidential procession” as running/walking by the side of the car. He apparently gave up and went back to base. Meanwhile George Hickey — who had been employed by the Secret service, mostly as a chauffeur, FOR LESS THAN FOUR MONTHS — had been designated to return the presidential car back to the airport once the show was over. He was sober, the only one sober on duty. Being in the following car, Hickey had been entrusted with an AR 15 — a new lightweight semi-automatic weapon armed with “explosive” bullets.
The story goes that the Secret service never have had a traitor in their ranks.
They never have had a snitch either. This is why Hickey became protected species, especially at the autopsies that clearly showed the bullet that blew JFK’s brain came from his AR 15 (or from a gun with the same calibre). This was the fourth bullet (an “explosive” bullet as demonstrated by the damage and the shrapnel left in the President brain — that is to say the bullet was not a full metal jacket, designed to break in many pieces on impact, thus inflict maximum damage.) fired by Hickey (or "someone" in the motorcade) this bullet was the one that destroyed Kennedy’s brain. This is classified information as to protect the US Secret Service. As well, the bullet entry hole of the bullet from the AR 15 (less than 6 mm) was demonstratively smaller than that coming from LHO’s gun (7 mm).
The reasons:
Why would Hickey (or someone from the Secret Service) shoot the president?
The maximum loony explanation that has been floated so far was that Hickey goofed and pulled the trigger willy-nilly when the first shot coming from LHO came through: one hit, two misses in less than 6 seconds. Note: this would have been an amazing feat produced by LHO that only one expert sharp-shooter managed to “reproduce” with bull-eyes in tests done with the type of gun used by LHO.
But the show from start to finish could look like a bad dangerous stupid Laurel and Hardy routine or a well organised double-cross. A lot of elements had to be taken cared of from start to finish, including getting the Secret service agents boozed up. Though people say that the US spy agencies and secret service were “naïve” at the time, I cannot buy that there was no conspiracy to kill JFK. There was.
How to make a Shakespearean play about this murdering conspiracy?
Was Hickey a plant sent from the CIA? Who managed Hickey before he joined "the Secret Service"?
Or was there another person using same "explosive" bullet size, near the president, who took the shot — say using a hand gun? GUN SMOKE was CLEARLY seen coming from the car — either the presidential car or the car immediately behind, as the cars were moving forward...
More in the next instalment
Gus Leonisky
Conspiracy analyst
Read from top.
See also:
a certain arrogance...a magic bullet and an explosive bullet.
Lee Harvey Oswald may have shot only two bullets.
One was the “magic bullet” that hit president Kennedy in the neck and went through Governor Connolly’s shoulder before exiting through his right wrist. It was said to be magic for its trajectory was see weirdly skewed at first but when the position of the Governor was reassessed, it was see as going in a straight line.
The second bullet by LHO hit the road surface. To some extend, I believe that had Oswald missed the President entirely, this would not have made any difference. Kennedy was a dead man. “They killed my husband!”
The third Oswald bullet was thought to have been fired, but had not been so. There were two spent cartridges next to Oswald gun on the floor of the room of the sixth floor of the Book Repository Building, while the third one was away in another corner of the room. It was an old spent cartridge used by LHO like many hunters always keep one in the breech of the gun to prevent damage to the firing mechanism, or such. Forensic would soon have proven that it had not been fired on that day. Forensic were shoddy. Police made a crook job.
This is why, during tests, ONLY ONE expert marksman amongst many, Donahue, had managed to fire 3 bullets in less than six seconds, including performing the clunky reloading of the Italian made gun. Oswald had only fired 2 bullets.
The third (and fourth) bullet(s) came from within the motorcade and only one bullet was fired. The fourth was the echo of the third bullet. The sounds were telling. From certain vantage points, the first and second bullets from Oswald could not be heard. The third and its immediate echo were clear. Ballistic would have shown then (as they did later on) that the third bullet came from a different angle — and could not have come from LHO’s shooting position.
So there was another shooter involved. Was it Hickey? No test was performed on his gun, the famous AR 15 with the “explosive” bullets. The AR 15 became the M16 and fires 5.56 mm bullets.
The .223 Remington (a.k.a.: 5.56×45mm or M193) is a rifle cartridge developed in 1957, for the ArmaLite AR-15. In 1964, the ArmaLite AR-15 was adopted by the United States Army as the M16 rifle and it would later become the standard U.S. Military rifle. The military version of the cartridge uses a 55 gr full metal jacket bullet and was designated M193. In 1980, the .223 Remington was transformed into a new cartridge, a 62 gr full metal jacket bullet with a seven grain steel core for better penetration and designated 5.56×45mm NATO(a.k.a.: SS109 or M855).[3]
So it appears that on autopsy of Kennedy, the bullet that took half of the president’s brain was a high velocity 5.57 (.223) Remington. Not a 6.8 low velocity Carcano projectile that would have gone “clean through”. The bullet was NOT A FULL METAL either. That is to say, this type of .223 bullet was exclusive to the Secret Service and designed to “explode” (break up in many pieces) in order to inflict maximum damage. The usage of “explosive” bullets on the battlefields had been made illegal by war “convention” in 1923.
The autopsy in Washington was semi-botched up, performed under distracting pressure from the Secret Service personnel and many other people present INSIDE THE ROOM. The doctor in charge called it a CIRCUS. He could not do his job properly. Pictures taken by the special coroner photographer and his assistant were never seen again. The X-rays showed the typical fragments of a Secret Service specially modified .223 bullet having “exploded”. The X-ray plates were never seen again.
The President’s body had been entirely stripped of his clothes and the results of the preliminary investigation in Dallas hospital were not supplied to the doctors in Washington. The body had been placed into a plastic bag that had become “bloodied”.
Expanding bullets, also known colloquially as dumdum bullets, are projectiles designed to expand on impact, increasing in diameter to limit penetration and/or produce a larger diameter wound for faster incapacitating of a living target. For this reason they are used for hunting and by some police departments, but are generally prohibited for use in war. Two typical designs are the hollow-point bullet and the soft-point bullet. Exploding bullets are designed to shatter in many pieces and even do more damage.
No wonder the Secret Service personnel inside the autopsy room were nervous and tried to thwart the autopsy by giving strict instructions and by distracting the doctors.
At this stage, there is 99.99 per cent chance that the Secret Service killed the President. Who?
Hickey? Hickey was the only one with the AR 15. Was there another weapon, a secret handgun that could fire this kind of bullet?
Hickey sued Donahue and the publisher of his book “ Fatal Error” in which Donahue blames Hickey for accidental shooting of the President. Hickey’s life is weird. We still don’t know if he died in 2005 or 2011.
Mortal Error: The Shot That Killed JFK is a 1992 non-fiction book by Bonar Menninger outlining a theory by sharpshooter, gunsmith and ballistics expert Howard Donahue that a Secret Service agent accidentally fired the shot that actually killed President John F. Kennedy.[1][2] Mortal Error was published by St Martin's Press in hardback, paperback, and audiobook.
Prior to the publication of the book in 1992, both the publisher and the author contacted Hickey to invite his participation in the book and offering him a chance to respond to the allegations. In 1995 Hickey sued St. Martin's Press over the claims made in Mortal Error.[22][23] The suit was eventually dismissed in 1997 on the grounds that Hickey had waited too long after the book's initial publication to file against the publisher.[24] Hickey refiled suit when the paper-back edition was published, and later settled with St Martin's Press in 1998 on undisclosed terms.[25]
Sources state that Hickey died in either 2005[26][27] or 2011.[28][29][30]
One reviewer of the book says:
David Von Pein
"Mortal Error's" Theory Doesn't Hold Up At All When Weighed Against The Evidence That Says It Never Happened
January 19, 2006
Format: Hardcover
The theory put forth in the book "Mortal Error" -- a kooky-as-all-get-out hunk of nonsense that has Secret Service Agent George W. Hickey Jr. accidentally firing the fatal gunshot into President John F. Kennedy's head in the midst of an assassination attempt being carried out by Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963 -- is a thoroughly preposterous and untenable theory, and there are several reasons why.
To begin with, the very idea that Agent Hickey would have actually had the extreme misfortune of being able to "find" JFK's head just perfectly via his one "accidental shot" that was discharged from his AR-15 rifle (and miss everything else and everybody else, miraculously, in between himself and JFK) is just way too far-fetched a notion for anyone to seriously consider as fact.
Giving credence to such a crazy theory would mean literally ignoring so many common-sense things (and ignoring so much evidence and witnesses), it's pathetic. Such as: You'd have to believe that Hickey just kept his mouth shut about the "accident" with his AR-15 rifle. And you'd have to believe that David Powers, a friend and personal aide of JFK's, who was sitting in the very same car as Agent Hickey, had somehow not even noticed this rifle blast going off just inches behind where he was seated (or you'll have to believe that Powers was "in" on the "cover-up" which would have followed, which is nonsense of the first order; Powers would be the very last person I'd suspect of covering up anything with respect to JFK's death).
If Hickey had truly fired that fatal shot, you'd also have to swallow that every one of the many other SS agents in that follow-up car in the motorcade either ALL didn't hear the loud rifle shot from right inside their own vehicle...or that all of these agents lied later on when none of them corroborated such a shot from Hickey's weapon. Logical? Hardly.
Plus: No witness that I am aware of claimed to have heard a shot being fired from around the area of "Queen Mary" (the SS code name for the Secret Service follow-up car), which is yet another annoying fly in this theory's ointment.
And the biggie -- If a Hickey shot killed the President, then a logical and reasonable explanation needs to be put forth to explain away the two large bullet fragments that were conclusively proven to have been fired from Lee Harvey Oswald's very own Carcano rifle that were found in the front-seat area of the Presidential limousine. And this book does not contain such a logical answer to that critical flaw within such a "Hickey Did It" theory.
Oswald fired three shots from the southeast corner window of the 6th Floor of his workplace (the Texas School Book Depository). The evidence supporting this fact is overwhelming. And it's obvious that his second shot (aka the "Single-Bullet Theory" shot) didn't produce the badly-damaged bullet fragments that were discovered on 11/22/63 in the limo's front seat. And, IMO, Oswald's first (missed) shot could not have caused the limo fragments either.
There are many flaws in this comment made in 2006. Further publications such as JFK The Smoking Gun by Colin McLaren published in 2013, give a lot more of the forensic details of why a Secret Service “explosive” bullet blew up the president brain, not the LHO’s Carcano bullets, of which only two were fired. McLaren went through the Warren report and subsequent release of documents, with a painstaking eye-watering investigation.
In this book, Hickey is still the culprit, by accident…
But was it an accident or a design?...
Who could have masterminded the whole operation?
McLaren makes reference to the Secret service and other services in the US spy industry being very coy about telling the truth. We shall see.
More to come